The job market will never be fixed until women are banned from working

The job market will never be fixed until women are banned from working

You want a male secretary? You want to visit male escorts? You want male bikini models?

Yes.

escorts

bikini models

This is why we need women to start marrying early you fucking retard. Then we wouldn’t have any of this degenerate shit

the dating market either. Imagine the salary increases from halving the workforce, only having to work with men (no HR), and how much better women would look and act if they had to land a man for financial security

Based and truthpilled

Less people making money will fix the economy

And this is why every conservative is a joke.

Women were industrious in one way or another for thousands of years before it became hip to lock hoes in the house in the last couple centuries
You realize they vote for importing niggers literally just to spite you over this, yes? Loosen the leash and she'll happily throw up romans with you. But that's not even what you want anyways since you're a turdie who just wants white sex slaves, right?

There should be professions specifically for women, like farming and stuff. Ban them from any positions of power

halving the workforce would mean massive economic contraction and everyone would be substantially poorer on average

Women’s jobs add some value but they are not essential like men’s jobs are. If women left the workforce we’d probably enter a deep economic depression but civilization wouldn’t collapse like it would if men left the workforce.

my original statement was not "women's work is essential to civilization". it was "without women working the economy would contract and everyone would be poorer". Would being substantially poorer and having a significantly reduced standard of living be okay with you just to stick it to women?

this

Loosen the leash

The leash doesn't even exist anymore you retarded fag

Those jobs are mostly extraneous and exist to make girlbosses happy and keep the government's civil rights divisions away. Businesses would be much more efficient without bloating that exists to avoid lawsuits for not having enough diversity. Lowered demand means things would cost less. The number of women working doesn't have to be zero but removing affirmative action laws would make it a hell of a lot lower and greatly improve society

we don't need women modeling women's clothes
a simple mannequin does the job

Is that your only hope to ever get a job OP?

that's a fancy bullshit way of saying prices for goods and services would go down, high paying jobs would be plentiful and homes would be affordable again.

prices of goods and services would skyrocket due to labor shortages. at the same time demand would crater since there'd be fewer customers, meaning businesses would all have to contract, eventually leading to less demand for labor and thus lower wages in the long run. it would suck for everyone. we're only able to maintain our current standard of civilization due to the size of the labor force. cut it in half and it'd suck for everyone. so either we keep women working or we start importing massive quantities of third world slave labor. which would you prefer?

Labor shortages would raise wages and be balanced out by lower demand. Funny how civilization was much better prior to women's mass entry into the labor force. Also we are getting the third worlders anyway thanks to infinite growth mindsets like yours and because your ideology destroys birthrates and leads to retarded political decisions

Women have always had jobs, it wasn't until after WW2 that the US became so rich that a single man could support a family. The real problems are immigration, stagnant wages, inflation and globalism.

If you’re being beaten out by women either you’re picking the wrong jobs or you’re a terrible candidate.

businesses would all have to contract

You mean worthless Etsy stores drop shipping garbage from China and bloated, unprofitable scam zombie companies surviving only off of low interest rate loans? We would be fine, we have too much bloat in our economy as it is right now.

Well..exactly the opposite, but you’re close.

push for more women to enter the workforce ramps up in the 70s

at the same time, the value of labor begins declining due to new over supply

at the same time, it starts becoming socially taboo to question such things

at the same time, the US abandons the gold standard

None of these things are a coincidence. Wages are so low because (((they))) want them to be and that will never change until the excess labor supply (women) leaves the market

You realise women NOT working is an incredibly recent phenomenon, right? My god read a fucking book for once in your life.

conflating women being employed by an employer and doing work around the house and their community for no reason

pretending not to know the difference

Kill yourself in real life

wages would go up at first but lower demand means lower growth, shrinking businesses, less opportunity, and ultimately lower wages. also women contributing to the gruntwork of society means talented people can specialize. if men had to do all the secretarial work women do, fewer people would be able to start companies, research cutting edge tech, etc. Future growth would shrink.

what was so much "better" about civilization 60 years ago? lower standards of living, smaller homes, more poverty, fewer conveniences, fewer services, fewer goods. what exactly was so about it? that women were in the kitchen where they belonged?

yes it does. who do you think funds HR departments? globalized banks run by old men

This is not true. Even if you look at the most primitive societies today. (Indigenous populations) women rely on men to hunt and get food while the women stay with the kiss.

This is common sense you can't escape biology. Women technically shouldn't be working. But even if they are working it's just in an ac building typing or doing paperwork or retail.

What was better is that a woman would've had no choice but to marry him and now he has to face the reality that the only way a woman would choose him is because it's marginally preferable to abject poverty.

Again, I already said the number of women in the workforce doesn't need to be zero - but preferentially getting women into admissions and hiring is obviously retarded and an artificial distortion. Demand for essentials would remain the same and "want" industries may contract. Fewer workers and higher wages may not in fact reduce demand much since higher wages would result in an equilibrium in household spending power. No one starting a company or researching cutting edge tech would be a receptionist, get real.

What was better is that >75% of the working class got married compared to in the low 40s now. Affordable housing, safe neighborhoods, above replacement birthrates, a country that wasn't slowly disintegrating. Wages coupled to productivity and much lower income inequality (because bosses didn't think like you, that you can sell your country out by offshoring to save on labor costs for MUH GROWTH). In short, everything.

Cope roastie, this is objective reality. Women aren't happy either (see the collapse in their happiness since 1970)

This is the dream. Men wouldn't be disposable anymore.

I'll accept being poorer if it means my life is richer.

How about they do that in the appropriate place (aka brothel)?

If you game out what ending the Civil Rights Era / Jewish Century would look like in practice:

80% of women in non-menial jobs immediately fired (because all they do is manage civil rights bureaucracy)

Marriage rates increase, divorce, suicide, and overdose rates plummet

Men incentivized to work instead of jerking off and smoking weed

Population collapse ends

Men return to academia

Scientific establishment regains function

Art, entertainment becomes good again

And so on, ad infinitum. No free association means we're living in a cesspool of distorted incentives for now, but nature always corrects herself eventually.

This is fucking so obvious. Not a surprise that Humanity literally chosen that from since ever until 1945.

LINE. GOES. UP. OKAYYY???

the natural order is that women shouldn’t work, all economic sense notwithstanding, the entire economy must be a meme

no men should not be disposable, I don’t like the natural order I want free pussy for my meme job

God only knows what the specimens inhabiting this thread look like, pathetic

Dawg everyone got JQd last year, now we are full 1488
Niggers and women dont deserve rights and its honestly unfair and cruel to pretend otherwise. Its like scolding a child for not knowing how to do quantum physics.

Correct. My biggest hope for this administration is getting rid of the Civil Rights Act, maybe even over dealing with immigration. Rufo has already hinted at it. Otherwise the correction will be the eventual collapse and balkanization of the US which will be much uglier.

Beg harder bitch. Really, what kind of man are you that you can’t compete with them for jobs and need them to need you? JFC…

I don't work in civil rights bureaucracy. Every society has been structured around women needing men until we built a successful enough one that women could be artificially propped up with fake jobs. This is because otherwise they don't have children or marry. The Greeks talked about this. We are going to repeal the 20th century.

You’re a shitskin.

Men wouldn't be disposable anymore.

Men have always been disposable, and likely will always be. Its nature.

It's the opposite really. We need to normalize men not working and women working in more male dominated fields like welding and trucking.
Our problem was we forced women into the workforce without letting men exit the workforce, and now everyone needs to be constantly working for all of our lives.

Your misplaced desire to remove women from work is delusionally unrealistic and emblematic of a fear of progress. Society will always keep moving forward. Maybe someday we'll even go back to having it be uncommon for women to work, but it won't be a backtrack to the 1900s, it'll be a result of social changes happening in the future as a response to progress today.

Men wouldn't be disposable anymore.

It’s funny how people who are most vehemently against trannies are like trannies themself. You don’t want to fulfil your biological role.

Women exit the workforce

More jobs are available and salaries are higher to attract a shrunken supply of workers

Women stop buying houses because they no longer work

The supply of available housing increases dramatically and prices fall as a result

women stop shopping

Money stops flowing to worthless garbage and needlessly sloshing around the markets, causing inflation to decrease, if not allowing prices for goods and services to fall to sane valuations

Just because this hurts your feelings, doesn't make it false. Women are a tumor on a productive economy, with the job market itself actually being the least of our worries.

No you won’t. You aren’t man enough.

Why have you guys not brought up the most obvious solution? AI and automation could fill almost all the roles women work in today. If such a cut was made, then AI would be massivly funded to fit the gaps.

And THAT is the fundamental challenge from women. It's why they push for refugees welcome, gay stuff, left wing bullshit. Either we as men put a stop to it or they destroy civilization and the men in the ashes put them in their place, which is what they long for. We will see if we are man enough to do it without western collapse!

AI/automation isn't a solution because it only addresses the supply side, not demand side. AI doesn't buy things. If demand and the overall economy is shrinking, who is going to invest in AI or automation? AI is also very expensive to run, and has yet to be proven that it's economical at all, or that the productivity gains justify the costs, or that it could actually perform tasks at an acceptable level

Just say you're a faggot.

I can't compete against women so we should ban them

KWAB

if you can't compete with women, why should anyone want you to work for them