B-b-b-b-but DTCC is coming!
While Sergey talks in hypotheticals and daydreams about a perfect, friction-less society, Securitize is hitting the bricks and actually acquiring customers (not shit coin crypto scams, which are 99% of chainlink's 'integrations')
Sad that Chainlink had a half decade head-start and are fumbling the bag in such a horrific way. It's a trainwreck that you can't help but to stare at
enthousiast
Checked. Thanks for the bump.
Your picrel is incongruent with the claims in your post.
How so? Can't wait to read this.
kek this, he is a shill pretending to be a fuddie, get fucked OP
ari is there
should we tell him?
Chainlink's lunch is being eaten indeed.
Dare I say that their hubris will lead to their downfall?
This is basically an IC3 event bro… how new are you?? Cornell is like the birthplace of Avax, Chainlink and Rose - at least from an academic point of view. Ari is literally in picrel as a speaker… im starting to think i got baited hard here…
In his role as IC3 director, Notice it doesn't list his CL Labs position. Details matter, linkie
still waiting bub
Where do i buy the securitize token
talking to the president
talking to house representative
talking to majority leaders in the chambers of congress
directly assisting with the proof of reserve bill via direct communication with law makers
THEY'RE NOT GONNA BE AT SOME BLOCKCHAIN CONFERENCE IN CORNEL TAKE THAT STINKIES WHO EVEN CARES ABOUT YOUR DEAD COIN ANYMORE
Just quit bro they're not paying you enough for the effort you have to shit out here.
Kek - he went quiet on that. Pretty sure he hadn't noticed Ari on the list and just went charging in shouting REEEEEE lol
talk, talk, talk. where's the implementation?
nearly a decade has gone by and still no bank transactions. 0 value flowing to token holder
That’s what happens when you’re hopped up on amphetamines and your eyes are so far apart you can barely see in front of you
Look above, you might have missed it. Addressed a different poster, but answer remains same
Damn youre right. Thats crazy how they mention his ic3 title at an ic3 event
THE hammerhead of biz
THE fetal alocohol syndrome looking faggot of biz
guise guise the DTCC attending the same conference with direct competitors of chainlink, effectively acknowledging them as legit providers, is bullish for chainlink!!
guise guise the fact that nobody from chainlink apart from Ari juels is there, without even using his Chief scientist is bullish for chainlink!!
guise guise the fact that the SWIFT representative assigned on the fireside chat with Sergey got replaced with Stani is bullish for chainlink!!!
bottom line is, absolutely nothing could possibly be interpreted as bearish for chainlink, under any circumstances
the amazing mind of the chainlink spammer shill never ceases to impress me
0 value flowing to token holder
But enough about Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple.
the mind of a chainlink spammer
Are you talking about op?
no I'm talking about you specifically
warosu.org
switch up your posting style and stop trying to force memes breh
but anon, all of those three had immense value flowing to their "token holders"
why don't you compare BTC, ETH, XRP respective ROI on their first 8 years of existence?
it’s a play on his “the cuckolds of crypto” spam.
Which is spammed much, much more here. See below. also lol @ everyone who uses that phrase being me. OP is one of the worst spammers on this board. Faggot
warosu.org
all of those three had immense value flowing to their "token holders"
Purely speculative value, yes.
Yeh Sergey was too busy in Washington ironing out new legislation with the President and Congress to turn up to this even and claim his free sandwich. Really dropped the ball there. Am totally selling my stack in 2 weeks lmao
OP is one of the worst spammers on this board
great, so you must be the second worst?
and?
ironing out new legislation
nice conjecture
pathetic guys, step up your game
I never make threads and post a few times per month. You’re a moron and that was a dogshit comeback
and?
Speculative value has nothing to do with "implementation" and definitely not with "bank transactions".
there there
cool, how does any of that relate to chainlink, which lacks both speculative value and "implementations" or "bank transactions"?
HOW DO I BUY SECURITIZE TOKEN????
not the hammerhead. face the reality that more and more people are being disillusioned, frustrated, and disgusted by the lack of progress/adoption/price appreciation of chainlink. and that number of those frustrated is growing by the day
in before
just sell
because that's all you cl labs shills have left in the tank. can't argue with the facts that progress is glacially slow, despite a team nearing 1000 employees. and the price is in the gutter and holders have made 0 financial gains holding this dogshit token (which is currently being used as a donation tool for cl labs) for 5 years
how does any of that relate to chainlink
Ask the guy I replied to.
I'm asking you though
The guy said things like implementation and bank transactions are what make value flow to cryptos.
Clearly that's not true.
the guy said that chainlink lacks implementation or bank transactions
how is that statement untrue?
don't conflate my sentences
0 bank transactions in nearly a decade
0 value flowing to token holders
For one thing, Chainlink has massive implementation.
0 value flowing to token holders
Speculative value, you mean.
What a dumpster fire of a thread lol
Chainlink has massive implementation.
not from banks though?
this entire industry is 'speculative value', is it not?
it's still value that is not flowing to chainlink's holders
No crypto has massive implementation from banks.
kek so by "value flowing to holders" you just mean speculative pumps
No crypto has massive implementation from banks
so you essentially agree with the guy
kek, schizo
don't tell me, you're in it for the tech. kek
which cyrpto has massive implementation from banks? If not, who is the closest?
This guy is >where's the implementation?
oh wait, that's you
I cant buy any token by securitize? Why is this thread here?
again with the conflating. all sergey & co do is talk, talk about adoption. but with no real implementation by entities that can move the needle (not crypto scams). the implementation is not there. they're danging a future that hasn't arrived after 15 years (crypto) and the bagholders still lick it all up despite them being financially bent over the past half decade by chainlink's price action
chainlink holders get no value from either real implementation (because there is none) or speculative
but with no real implementation
WHOA BRO YOU'RE IN IT FOR THE TECH?????
chainlink has been the closest since 2017
you might not remember it, but this project had already connections to SWIFT from 2016, the company was directly mentioned by Klaus Schwab on his book 2 full years before ICO, and autists have managed to find evidence connecting powerful people such as Sandro Salsano and Blythe Masters very close to Chainlink right from the start
in other words, this project was kingmade and unfuddable
fast forward 8 years later, and apparently they're still close, but not there yet, Sergey by his own admission, had severely miscalculated the willingness of legacy entities to adopt their tech, and even worse, that said tech has been drown in feature creep and development hell, failing to release any of their planned products with fully fledged features for more than 5 years, with the only excuse being "lacking legislation", or "waiting for their legacy backers to give the ok"
to be frank, nobody would care about any of this if the token was at triple digits, but here we are
you can't deny that this whole narrative doesn't make sense after 8 years, seeing the lack of tangible progress or results
the cl bagholders will certainly claim there are. because they definitely aren't still interested in financial gains (as there aren't any, except if you're a cl labs employee)
the cl bagholders will certainly claim there are
kek
Nobody is more obsessed with "the tech" than fuddies. As you keep proving.
No crypto has mass bank adoption, but Chainlink is the closest.
If you disagreed you wouldn't be in here.
you can't deny that this whole narrative doesn't make sense after 8 years, seeing the lack of tangible progress or results
this. exactly this
what is the point of insta replying when you're not even reading the posts? you're literally posting in bad faith at this point
I read the whole thing, dumbass.
You're whining about the lack of bank adoption when nobody in crypto has any.
no
read it again
very cool but never selling
btw Ari Juels wrote Chainlink white paper incase you didnt know
Just like Eric Schmidt distanced himself from chainlink, Ari Juels is also
so much this saars
again much bullish ari being same table with securitize without even using official cl role saars much bullish fuck basterd benchod fudcucks saars buy the token
seeing the lack of tangible progress or results
???? The Swift rep stated their platform is going live at the end of 2025/early 2026?
this whole narrative doesn't make sense after 8 years, seeing the lack of tangible progress or results
i.e. lack of bank adoption
Does any crypto project have any bank transactions?
the bankers coin, XRP, has none.
fud faggots seething that chainlink is about to make 500k onchain everyday starting tomorrow when AAVE implements SVR
Eric Schmidt probably got frustrated that Sergey wouldn't listen to his ideas (remote work).
That, and he broke up with his Steel Perlot girlfriend who got him involved with CL in the first place.
A guy who is worth north of $20 billion isn't going to waste his time advising a 30-something who thinks he knows better than everyone
8 more months guise this time for real
ok
what happened to blythe dude? why did DA drop all blockchain pilots 2 years ago? any clues? what about salsa salami man?
don't tell me he actually made his money and then bailed
I see
Neither do BTC or ETH.
Even the coins in the ETFs are simply held by CEXes.
yeah but those two, unlike chainlink, have netted massive returns for their early adopters, especially during the first 8 years of their existence
so your constant comparison to them is retarded
at this point, chainlink is comparable to shit like railblocks
those two, unlike chainlink, have netted massive returns for their early adopters
In pure speculative pumps, yes.
8 more months guise this time for real
Who is closer than 8 months away? Who else has published research with Swift?
Can you please stop conflating the statements of 'bank adoption' and 'value transfer to token holders'?
BTC and ETH don't have bank txs, but look at their returns in their respective first 8 years of existence. Surely Link, apart of the holy trinity, would have similar, no? Oh wait.
Speculative value is still value
Can you please stop conflating the statements of 'bank adoption' and 'value transfer to token holders'
You faggots keep saying Chainlink needs bank adoption to have value transfer to holders.
Lol. Chainlink has outperformed BTC and eth from 2017.
I shouldnt have replied to you. you are clearly suffering from fetal alcohol syndrome.
Can you read?
Look at BTC & ETH's returns in THEIR first 8 years of existence. Then look at link's.
WHAT
yeah the problem is that chainlink has been in the same state (close to adoption) for the last 8 years, and now you're telling me it's only 8 more months away
well, I've been hearing that every year since 2017, so you may understand my skepticism
after all, Sergey misjudged them once, who's to say he won't do so again?
but the SWIFT spokesperson said x
yeah, and 5 years ago, the Oracle top dog had also said about integration with chainlink, guess how that went
anyway, I'm sure you get my point
chainlink has been in the same state (close to adoption) for the last 8 years
Ripple has been in that state for the last 13 years.
ETH has been in that state for the last 11 years.
ALL OF CRYPTO is waiting for massive adoption.
(close to adoption) for the last 8 years
According to who? The community?
anyway, I'm sure you get my point
I dont.
I really don't think he, or the rest the the top-buying bagholders, do get it. give them a few more years and they may understand. "THIS IS THE YEAR....2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025"
What are you failing to grasp here?
All of crypto is waiting for massive adoption, yes. Coins can still have significant speculative increase in price in the meantime
All of crypto is waiting for massive adoption, yes.
but who is the closest?
Right.
Every single crypto in existence has pumped the way it has without bank adoption.
So it's retarded to single out Chainlink and pretend it has underperformed because it has no bank adoption.
Simple logic, right anon?
Sure, i'll accept that. But it really makes one think, if Link is the closest to massive adoption, why has progress ground to a halt and why isn't there a speculative frenzy? It is entirely strange and makes no sense at all.
AGAIN, you are conflating speculative returns and bank adoption.
YOU are the one claiming Link has no "value transfer to holders" because it has no bank adoption.
why isn't there a speculative frenzy?
oh we have a few ideas about that, see pic.
I absolutely did not. You may have inferred that, but it simply was not the case.
why has progress ground to a halt
It hasnt. Once again, Swift says their paltform is now going live. Are you fucking retarded?
and why isn't there a speculative frenzy?
Cause Link doesn't get media attention. Nobody knows that Chainlink attended the white house and is now working on bills with the federal government.
whats the problem that there is another oraacle network?
this has been known since 2017. it was never only going to be chainlink.
Then basically you're agreeing that the market is retarded.
22 pbtid
I've been hearing this for years now. When it actually goes live in production (not live trials), I'll believe it. Excuse my skepticism, like the other guy above said as well
The market is retarded and Chainlink has dragged their feet with the massive time/$ advantage they were given. Both these things can be true
Chainlink has dragged their feet with the massive time/$ advantage they were given
Not really
Remember that Chainlink has pretty much taken over defi about five years ago.
And as for bank adoption: nobody's closer than them. Especially now with the Trump admin.
I've been hearing this for years now.
Round in circles we go. No you havent. Show me anything about Swift stating their platform was going live years ago? Swift has never said anything remotely close to this.
If you've been around long enough (you haven't), you've heard ad-nauseum for half a decade that institutional adoption is right around the corner and THIS IS THE YEAR
Checked. This is the year confirmed. WAGMI bros.
your keyboard to god's ears.
Checked. Looks like 2025 was the year. Still in time for $81,000 by 2026.
March 26, 2021
LINK: $27
BTC: $55k
DOGE: $0.05
SOL: $14
XRP: $0.55
BNB: $255
March 26, 2025
LINK: $15
BTC: $86k
DOGE: $0.19
SOL: $139
XRP: $2.41
BNB: $626
are you ever walking around town and you hear a cry far off in the distance? Your first thought might be someone in trouble but have no fear... it's the sound of absolute EUPHORIA a link marine is experiencing after imaging new ways the team and their advocates can shit all over them
they're insatiable, craving more, time and time again
THE Cuckolds of crypto
THE Cuckolds of crypto
for your sake, get a new schtick
Sergey was too busy in Washington ironing out new legislation
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA "ironing out" i'm fucking dying over here
the loyal saps believe anything fat boy feeds them
2022:
i'm hearing interesting things out of Asia
remember he used to say that one
he was inferring he was in talks with their governments
3 years later, ccip does $500 daily, meanwhile securitize/wormhole snatched blackrock from you like taking candy from a baby
the more time goes by, the more prophetic this interview from years ago rings true
smoked
and they have the gall to call fudders deranged. it really is something when you step back and look at it
youtube.com
The "Proof Of" Bill that we're working on with a number of other legislators and their staff and other groups, here in DC...
Just swifts source will suffice, thanks
TRUTH>TRUST
kek, that's gold coming from cl labs thesedays
kek OP instantly btfo'd himself by posting a pic of a Chainlink cartel crew event. Even Ari is in the pic.
Fuddies hitting new levels of retardation as their minds break over LINK owning the entire US government adopting crypto narrative.
How do you feel about Sergey meeting with legislators in DC for the purposge of writing a bill?
kek if you think he will even mention cl
I would have to see the draft of the bill, honestly. Tired of talk and conference and photo ops.
bitcoinist.com
Hoskinson stated that he has been “talking with a lot of different senators and definitely engaging with the right people,”
“I already have some embedded people that have been in pretty deep conversations,” he added, emphasizing the depth of his team’s involvement in ongoing discussions.
He outlined a comprehensive plan involving three key avenues: administrative changes and rulemaking, executive orders, and lawmaking. “What can be done through administrative changes and rulemaking,” he said, noting these are the “easiest but very ephemeral.” Recognizing the temporary nature of executive orders, he stated that they “live and die by the administration.”
The Cardano founder highlighted several critical areas that need addressing, including taxation, custody standards, consumer protection, and asset classification. He stressed the necessity of a “Bill of Rights for crypto,” advocating for the support and defense of non-custodial wallets. “Making sure that we can use crypto the way we want to use crypto,” he said, is essential for the industry’s growth.
Cope. You dint even realize Ari was in that pic lol
Its not 100% written yet. You probably wouldnt even get half way through before you lost interest
yes i'm aware he told his retarded sycophants "we" are working on the bill
you're getting played kid
Why wasnt Charles at the whiteouse with Sergey then? He publicly stated he was invited (and was clearly disappointed) but hes talking to lawmakers? Sounds like more bullshit stories from the PHD Vietnam heli jumper.
chainlink has been in the same state (close to adoption) for the last 8 years
nigger the mainnet went live like 5 years ago
it never was anywhere that close to adoption, we just saw the beard crumbs and became schizophrenic about it
the last two years we started to heating up and now we surpassed our deepest dreams
he's literally the co-founder of chainlink you retarded nigger. I know sir gay is fat enough to be everywhere in the world at once but that doesn't mean he attends every event. if anything this is proving the point that LINK is becoming so important that the work of speaking at events now needs to be split up.
Sergey is too busy shilling LINK to the president of the united states and congress to speak here now. When all of this finally gets priced in the green candles are going to melt faces, they might even be so bright they'll burn the shit off your skin and turn you white. Not likely but there's hope for you yet OP
actually ari is working against himself because he wearing a different hat
lmao lol even
I know sir gay is fat enough to be everywhere in the world at once
fuckin lel
BLACKROCK (memecoin) is the ultimate play. Holders are raking in solid SOL rewards every 5 minutes, with a steady stream of payouts that keep coming. This isn’t just another token—it’s a powerhouse delivering real value. Don’t miss your chance to be part of something big.
dexscreener.com