The new fud is “don’t collect your build rewards!”
The new fud is “don’t collect your build rewards!”
strictly prohibited
are linkers actual morons?
define "legal liability"
define the meaning of the term "strictly prohibited"
just don't do it ok, you never know what might happen
the meaning
prohibition is meaningless without tangible consequences
I sold my tax liability's worth from claiming the air drop. IRS doesn't give a fuck if you sell drugs as long as you pay your taxes
it said "may" so that means there are no consequences in blatantly violating the TOS
illiterate or a retard? I genuinely can't tell
what are the consequences, anon?
case by case basis anon, if it comes down to that, the court of law would probably decide if you are legally liable
counter point; if the risk of legal liability is non existent, why would cll include that on their TOS?
just break the TOS
nah
the court of law
so chainlink labs will be filing a suit against anyone who uses a vpn?
legally liable
to do what, exactly? giving the tokens back?
if the risk of legal liability is non existent, why would cll include that on their TOS?
because they are gay little faggots?
so chainlink labs will be filing a suit
no, that would be the Internal Revenue Service
to do what, exactly
most likely rape you to death with tax evasion charges
hurrrr they only included that on the TOS because they're gay little fags amirite guide
kek, literal clueless manchild
point me to the section of the tax code that forbids you from claiming an airdrop? (I'll save you the time and tell you that it doesn't exist)
point to me the section of the tax code that allows undeclared income
what does "undeclared income" have to do with anything? pay your taxes on the airdrop, it's not hard.
like I said, you're clueless and you shouldn't be in a position to advise others
reminder you posted this;
the only reason they included that on the TOS is because they're gay little faggots
I see you are conceding, thank you for the fun waste of time.
The consequences are sergey breaking down your door at 3am with a barrel pointed at your gut if you dont hand over your private keys
sorry man, you're genuinely retarded
what does airdrops have to do with undeclared income?
dastardly
why are you evading taxes? who introduced tax evasion to this question? you don't think it's possible to claim the airdrop and pay taxes on it?
no, because cll TOS is strictly prohibiting you from participating in the airdrop
it can't be more straightforward than this and your denial is hilarious
Iindeed, now let's circle back to what "prohibition" means. the TOS claims that the consequence of violation is "legal liability". What do you think this means, anon? Do you think CLabs will be suing VPN users to claw back their SxT tokens?
I already gave you an answer
You babbled about the IRS, a completely different organization that does not give a fuck about tokens you receive as long as you pay taxes on them. For some reason you came up with an imaginary situation where you would not pay your taxes on your airdrop. What does this have to do with Chainlink's TOS?
dude are you retarded?
On a real note i would be cautious if the TOS actually prohibits using a VPN to claim rewards. All Cexs registered in the US have to report everything and if you were caught with this they wont go after you specifically unless youre given the al capone treatment.
They could also potentially flag your address in the pool and force you to withdraw but thats just my theory
Are you? I'm thinking the answer is yes.
Report what, exactly? Please point me to the legal statute forbidding you from claiming an airdrop.
I wouldnt be suprised if there are jewish tricks to track you down and rape your assets. Digital warthogs that can smell you from 2 miles away and chase you down
Thats just my assumption. I knew a guy in a similar situation and i dont want the IRS to be hounding me down 15 years later
how are you supposed to pay taxes on something you're not eligible to receive you imbecile?
not eligible to receive
According to who, Chainlink? Chainlink doesn't write the legal code. Chainlink is the one insinuating that someone using their interface could constitute "fraud". Which means the legal onus is on Chainlink to prove that claim in court.
Well if you cash out onto a cex, especially one thats registered in the US it automatically sends every transaction you do to the IRS to calculate your short term and long term gains. If you were caught say receiving potentially registered securities and flagged from the cex address theyll send those digital warthogs to sniff you out
according to who, Chainlink?
yes, it's their service and their TOS
you're an actual moron
It is not illegal for a citizen to buy or receive a security.
Define me churning your asshole with my huge hard meat cock.
It is illegal when the issuer of the security is strictly prohibiting the citizen holy fucking shit
Okay, again, so you believe Chainlink will be suing VPN users to get their SxT tokens back? Because that is what you are implying. It is up to Chainlink to do that. Not the IRS, like you imagine for some retarded reason.
no, THE IRS
Are you retarded? Why would the IRS sue you on Chainlink's behalf? The IRS does not care about Chainlink's TOS. Fucking lmao.
Chainlink is not a legal entity you absolute moron
Right, which means they would have to prove their claims about "fraud" in court.
I think the most reasonable thing is that if you somehow staked with a KYC'd wallet and using and american IP address they could potentially blacklist your address from the pool. That being said if you werent KYC'd and you do use a VPN theyll have a hard time catching you. Just be smart about it and use a fresh device and ensure your IP and DNS doesnt get exposed as american
Chainlink is not relevant, at all, they prohibited access, and you violated their TOS knowingly
the legal liability is not against Chainlink you literal bafoon
I think the most reasonable thing is that if you somehow staked with a KYC'd wallet and using and american IP address they could potentially blacklist your address from the pool
True. I think that would be amazingly petty and stupid of them to do, but I suppose it could happen. In which case an American could simply withdraw from staking and exit Chainlink if they wish.
Chainlink is the one declaring that a certain subsection of users is "ineligible." They would need to personally pursue violators to seek restitution, it doesn't just happen magically and automatically. You are suggesting that Chainlink will be suing VPN users to prove they violated their TOS.
You are not legally liable to Chainlink, you are legally liable to your own federal government agencies holy fuck you're retarded
Chainlink has zero incentive to go after you, they don't have their own "laws" you absolute moron
you are legally liable to your own federal government agencies
Which agency, anon? Again, the IRS does not care about Chainlink's TOS and is not responsible for enforcing Chainlink's claims of fraud, which Chainlink must prove in court.
Absolute lol, the fud is now the irs will hunt you down if you use a vpn
These idiots dont have a clue about the legal system
Tell me fuddie-kun about all the people that vpn in to netflix that were sued by the irs cause thats also a tos violation
That would mean you sent the sxt into the exchange and this is assuming the exchange and the IRS gives enough of a shit about your 0.14 tokens. They might, but that's why you don't send sxt, just send USDC or whatever else and claim the cost basis as whatever the token was worth when you got it.
There's still the risk Chainlink would disqualify people who used VPN from accessing the interface and future build rewards
And put those goalposts right back where you found them
Lmao. Just pointing out the real risk of losing rewards access if you use a VPN. It’s not moving goalposts, just how these programs works as stated in the TOS.