The digital equivalent of the "shot heard round the world". It really is over for Chainlink

The digital equivalent of the "shot heard round the world". It really is over for Chainlink.

a jeet airdrop farmed VC scam has high metrics? riveting insight

whats wormhole

that's how I call your mum because whatever I put in her it'll just disappear

dune.com/synthquest/chainlink-ccip

pic related. Why would someone use this as their reference to construct the infograph? Are they perhaps retarded? Or just a Wormhole shill? Eitherway the post is fake and gay, and OP is also gay.
Saged.

retard.png - 1316x658, 66.69K

Oh okay. Please post the updated number then.

I bet you won't :)

500 billion messages with CCIP vs 1 billion with wormhole

kekfuddies

I won't because I can't. Chainlink have been retarded and have made their explorer opaque af. Even the Linkpool dashboard isn't accurate because it's missing several chains.
dune.com/linkpool/chainlink-ccip
Eitherway, it's obvious enough the chart posted in op was made disingenuously so I am simply going to ignore it. If they used fake numbers for the Chainlink stats then who's to say they didn't use fake numbers for the Wormhole stats? Be more authentic next time and maybe you'll keep smart anons' attention. This is my last post in the thread. Saged, fag.

whats messages even mean? these cryptos are trying to be like some kind of telegram app now or something

x.com/Securitize/status/1838229583394406882

Its amazing how corrupt this space is.

Wormhole for its unmatched security, proven results, and flexibility.

Did they ever explain how the $320m was stolen, how they fixed the exploit and how the funds were given back?

messages

At current pace it would take them 16 years to reach 2B messages so seems like they did some padding here and there lmao. The discrepancy between total volume and 24h volume is way smaller: would take them 3 years to double their total volume at current pace, which seems reasonable. That makes it a way better indicator to use.

Wormhole's current total volume is according to their scan is close to $50B, while Chainlink according to Linkpool's dashboard is just north of $200m. Quite a big difference, not to mention way more reliable than some bs "amount of messages" which tells us nothing besides maybe how inefficient a protocol is at swapping.

MuhBignumber.png - 831x344, 23.19K

>Wormhole for its unmatched security

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

I wonder if they counted the $321m towards the total volume counter in their explorer

with "messages" they can pretend it's something else, while with volume not even they can pretend it's anything else but empty jeet aidrop farming volume

total "message" volume

lol its the same scam sol uses to suggest it has actual adoption

It such a joke. I didnt realize how corrupt this industry was until this happened. Theyre blatantly lying now.

lmao at this is direct distraction from the higher ones

i-it will be wormhole, no layzero, no chainlink

meanwhile we had all the news of the last 12 months about adaption

It's one thing to choose a system despite multiple historic failures, I mean it's bad but it happens.
But to openly claim that system has "unmatched security" is just vile.

It’s chainlink but except it’s actually mass adapted

I won't because I can't

aaand /thread
linkies are utterly desperate and unhinged

b-b-but muh hacks from 3 years ago11!

kek

Now that wormhole is slandering chainlink in these posts, theres a reason why Securitize is not speaking at smartcon. Im really looking forward to what happens to these two though. How chainlink responds but also what happens with wormhole now that theyre a big target for hackers.

hacks from 3 years ago

24-22 = 3

lmao nigger math you fucking nigger.
Also, it was 321 million USD.
And they have exploits and downtime all the time.

500 billion gazillion majillion!

Wow super cool bro!

they have already responded, they called securitize irresponsible and clg has had many lengthy blogposts slandering wormhole/l1 and arguing with their devs (and getting absolutely annihilated in the process)
kek
by your own retarded logic, clg is actually slandering a competitor as we speak, but it's okay and ethical if Chainlink does it, amirite
THE ABSOLUTE STATE

i-it's 2 years, not 3!1

kek

they have already responded

CLG doesnt speak for Sergey you moron.

arguing with their devs (and getting absolutely annihilated in the process)

CLG blew them all out of the fucking water retard. Most stopped responding because CLG was literally right about everything.

I was talking about Chris Barret, you imbecile

CLG blew them all out of the fucking water retard

CLG ignored every argument thrown at him, backtracked his original posts, responded with a bunch of non sequiturs and the usual semantics circular arguing, and then literally quoted fishy instead of continuing to argue with them
you are so clueless it's painful

this level of butthurt

lmao you're one of the twitterfags who got BTFO by him, aren't you.

Go back to twitter and stay there.

t.

1513787334458.jpg - 782x700, 74.71K

and then literally quoted fishy instead of continuing to argue with them

you are so clueless it's painful
Gee, I wonder why. Its like you fucking rats dont fucking get it after saying it 50 times. Why is he going to repeat himself again again, repeating the same thing for you fucking little mongrel scammers.

l2beat.com/bridges/projects/portal

765755675675.png - 679x326, 180.88K

a scammer shill irate about having his shit thrown back at him

m-m-muh risk!11

m-m-muh perfect CCIP record with 8 and a half users!111

implying Chainlink services are risk-less or decentralized or properly audited or fully functioning or even transparent at all

cry harder

muhrisk.png - 1111x165, 38.7K

holy triggered

t. triggered

I bet you have a huge Link folder.

My worm in ur moms hole lmao

chainlink wont be used because of muh lack of interest

You definitely got BTFO by CLG on twitter hahahaha.

I don't even have a twitter hahahaha
thanks for playing, sent fishy my regards when you talk to him

You not only have a twitter, you have many accounts on there.
You're literally the one anon who keeps bringing up twitterfags like clg and fishy on here.

NOBODY else gives two shits about twitter or either of those faggots, but for some reason you are completely obsessed with them.

you might not be fishy but you know fishy!!!!

In all seriousness, how well do you think wormhole will perform? They have a huge target on their head now and have already been exploited for $300mill.

I don't even have a twitter hahahaha

1599090147117.png - 521x454, 564.42K

CLG ignored every argument thrown at him, backtracked his original posts, responded with a bunch of non sequiturs and the usual semantics circular arguing, and then literally quoted fishy instead of continuing to argue with them

I don't even have a twitter hahahaha

you sure about that? You cant read comments without having an account

543535353.gif - 640x624, 133.95K

Guess it’s a good thing I sold and now hodl fun instead

nobody cares

you do
I dare you and you to doxx me like Adem and find my twitter account(s)
go on, I'll be waiting
I assume you know him given how offended and triggered you became once his name was dropped
thanks for proving my point, btw

how well do you think wormhole will perform

I dunno, personally I'm going to trust Blackrock instead of CLG or fishy

They have a huge target on their head now

and why is that a bad thing? I mean you could argue the same for Chainlink, give they're the industry standard and secure so many billions and billions of value daily through feeds, ccip, etc
yes, find my account man, go on

double posting

kek, looks like I kicked the hornet's nest ITT

You cant read comments without having an account

KEK

you do

Literally the only reason I know about CLG or fishy at all is because you cannot stop posting about them every single fucking day.

sweaty you know there are ways to read twitter without having an account, right?
so you don't have a twitter? huh

and why is that a bad thing?

Are you retarded? They have been exploited and now theyre handling even more money?

I mean you could argue the same for Chainlink

Sure, when was their last exploit?

yes, find my account man, go on

In case you missed it, You cant read comments without having an account. You definitely have one and im not going to look for it.

>double posting

Forgot to address the first sentence.

They have been exploited and now theyre handling even more money

so? if you're in this business you know hacks are coming, you either prepare for it or you drown in shit
your point makes no sense, you think Chainlink doesn't have a huge target on their heads because they haven't been exploited yet? so you think hackers just gave up and said "fuck this dude, Chainlink's impossible to break!"
lmao

You cant read comments without having an account

maybe you can't, kek

just fpbp as usual. Another hack is inevitable. And while we're talking about vc scams, i can't wait for solana to shit the bed.

so? if you're in this business you know hacks are coming, you either prepare for it or you drown in shit

Lemme guess theyre "battle tested"? They know how to deal with hacks right because they were hacked? This doesn't make you smart, it making you fucking stupid.

you think Chainlink doesn't have a huge target on their heads because they haven't been exploited yet?

You should try. Theyre the largest oracle that has transferred the most amount of money but havent been hacked yet. I wonder why?

so you think hackers just gave up and said "fuck this dude, Chainlink's impossible to break!"

Yes actually.

to doxx me like Adem and find my twitter account(s)

sweaty you know there are ways to read twitter without having an account, right?

So you admit to using Twitter just without having an account? How does that make a difference? Maybe you didn't personally get BTFO by CLG or whatever frenemy you and your buddies have on there, but it's obvious you care a great deal and follow that shit religiously. Why else would you continuously bring it up here on Anon Babble?

you and your buddies

It's literally one guy.

I never said any of that shit

Yes actually.

lol, I don't know if you're naive or legitimately stupid
or both

So you admit to using Twitter just without having an account

yes, I'm guilty as charged

How does that make a difference?

huh? regarding what?

Maybe you didn't personally get BTFO by CLG

indeed

but it's obvious you care a great deal

I care exactly as much as you do

Why else would you continuously bring it up here on Anon Babble?

I don't, why are you projecting shit?
???
who's the guy?

bro just kill yourself already.

lol, I don't know if you're naive or legitimately stupid

What do you think is a bigger target.

A) A secure bank that has never been robbed.

Or

B) A bank that has no security, has been robbed multiple times and are currently transferring more money into the bank.

I don't, why are you projecting shit?

Projecting? I'm just paying attention.

clg has had many lengthy blogposts slandering wormhole/l1 and arguing with their devs (and getting absolutely annihilated in the process)

This is not about Twitter drama?

CLG ignored every argument thrown at him, backtracked his original posts, responded with a bunch of non sequiturs and the usual semantics circular arguing, and then literally quoted fishy instead of continuing to argue with them

This is not about Twitter drama?

I have this meme saved, but I don't bring up Twitter drama on Anon Babble, no sir! That's projection!

thanks for playing, sent fishy my regards when you talk to him

It's pretty obvious you care a great deal about what is being said on Twitter, follow it on the foot, AND post about it on here. Why? And why deny it?

Securitize is utterly fucked and whoever made that decision has just ended his career in flamboyant style. What a holy disaster that prick dug kek

meh the response from the CL team over all this has been very disappointing. It was amateurish and immature. Someone should put a muzzle on clg. Take the high road next time, something like "while we're disappointed in Securitize's decision, we hope to work with them in the future" etc etc

There's really no point to create unnecessary adversaries in business. I really don't understand the antagonistic attitude that CL gives off not only to other companies in the space, but also their investors. It's very hard to like these people and sometimes that's enough to make people go the other way.

For anyone here who's worked in a sales/client facing business, I'm sure you'll agree w the fact that a good relationship can often beat the best absolute product/service. You can catch more flies with honey...

Fpbp kek

kek a literal Blackrock partner just described a known failure of a bridge that lost a quarter of a billion and still shits itself on the regular as having "unmatched security", but the REAL problem is some twitterfag debating technical minutiae.
Sure thing faggot

Its almost like your money is at stake in the most corrupt shit filled industry

what exactly is a "message"
i'm willing to hate chainlink of course but it sounds like a pretty stupid metric designed to massage the numbers

They counted Pyth price reports as messages for Wormhole, so basically any single transfer of data. They didnt use Chainlink price reports though lol

link to chainlink (the company or their staff) chastising securitize?