New chainlink fud just dropped

i think the classic

control-F chainlink 0 results

works just fine here

What exactly do you think "Swifts blockchain infrastructure" is?

whatever it is, it isn't chainlink. all chainlink has with swift is a couple of PoCs

If you cant tell me what it is, why should I trust you to tell me what it isnt?

CBDCs

i cannot be more excited for you kids !!!11

ha- good answer. great, in fact.

nah it's a cope answer. a copeswer, if you will

right, it was an impressive partnership that we've know about since 2016

how does it help the token

right, it was an impressive partnership that we've know about since 2016

how does it help the token

cover16.jpg - 1600x900, 104.17K

Link is just a JSON parser

checked
so how does it help the token go up again?

? I don't know what that response means

Checked and keked

So? Any ideas genius?

Checked and got 'im!

1602241166368.png - 1353x1011, 1.15M

ctrl+f 'chainlink
results: 0

OMG MORE HECKLING BREADCRUMBS 1-7 YEARS UNTIL LINK TAKES OVER THE ENTIRE FINANCIAL WORLD OMG OMG WOOZIES 11!!!111!

1513787334458.jpg - 782x700, 74.71K

this is about the issuance of stablecoins onto a blockchain/s
that is not what chainlink is
chainlink is the "interlinking" of the blockchains

this stuff is exactly what we want to see. proper adoption of blockchain. this market and board is good at distorting time and perspective. crazy how far we've come from blockchain is a scam and a joke from a couple of years ago

easy quant and xrp
thats a well that will never run dry

Keep all chainlink discussion to the official general thread, thank you

yeah but the stables have to hop between bank chains. they'll do it using decentralized offchain relayers i.e. a chainlink DON that will get slashed if it fucks up

No

all 3 megabanks listed in the article are official partners of Ripple but i'm sure it's nothing

don't take my word for it, google "(name of bank) + Ripple"

and R3 (xinfin/xdc)

How is this fud? Am I getting bamboozled

I don't get it. What's the point of stablecoins when you're connected to SWIFT and can just send regular currency?

if you're connected to a blockchain you need something that can be / can be represented on the blockchain. $ £ Euros can't yet, but private institutions have an equivalent 1:1 that can (think of the wild west and each town having its own bank and own currency) .
are cbdc's going to compete with stablecoins? unlikely.
they'll probably be upstream of stablecoins.
what linkies, myself included, are counting on is all of these stablecoins , cbdc's coming, tokens, will need moving around and there will have to be a common standard connector. Swift appear to think the same.

Why use USDT when you're a bank and can just use USD over SWIFT?

moving tokenized assets (currencies) through existing Swift infrastructure

hmmmm

BECAUSE ANON YOU NEED LPL TO SEND REGULSR CURRENCY USING SWIFT DUUH

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOWS IT GOING BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS POOLS FUCKING CLOSED

FUCKING SEETHE

you're one step closer on figuring out that crypto is useless

this is about the issuance of stablecoins onto a blockchain/s

No, it's about sending stablecoins between banks via Swift.
Learn to read.

Because tokenized assets >>>> traditional assets when it comes to transaction speed, programmability, cost reduction, ...
There's a reason nearly all financial institutions are lusting after tokenized assets.

I never would have expected for every schizo Link theory to come true but yet the price remaining single digits. I just don’t get it

IMG_9218.jpg - 828x803, 72.43K

I think you might have forgotten the fact that the token is not needed

Token needed for literally everything nodes have done since May 2019.

Makes perfect sense when you know that uncannily timed bitcoin dumps stole every morsel of hype and momentum away from virtually every single instance where a schizo link theory came true