Can sit down with THE president

can sit down with THE president

can't send burgers the shitcoins he promissed them

They aren't being "caution," they're being malicious

Trump is part of the executive branch.
The parties that need to actually change the current climate (see pic) are the legislative branch (congress) and the judicial branch (the courts).
Basically either congress makes new laws, or the courts establish clear case law.

Why do people who were promised Build coins lose the chance to claim them after 90 days?

And there go the goalposts kek

Shhhhhhhh

There are no goalposts, that's just a thought-terminating cliche.

if you cant figure out the game you dont get to play

it's malicious to exclude burgers

*get deboonked*

actually it's malicious to enact 90 days

Classic goalpost move.

It's malicious because the window to claim them closes, when they could just keep it open until things are settled.

Do you guys not have VPNs?

So make a thread about that.
Because your OP argument just went out the window

The thread is about their actions being malicious
The 90 day period is the key fact that shows it to be malicious. The argument is modified, not eliminated.

The thread is about their actions being malicious

No, it's about excluding burgers being malicious.

You're being excessively pedantic. It doesn't matter where precisely the point of maliciousness lies when the overall action is tainted by maliciousness, resulting in loss of funds or compromised wallet that can lead to exclusion of future rewards.

You said excluding burgers is malicious, but as soon as that's debunked you move onto a completely different aspect and say that's malicious.
It shows you're not arguing in good faith, and you're just looking for things to call malicious.

There's malicious behavior that overall results in a negative outcome for holders.
That (overall) malicious behavior is composed of multiple parts.

denying funds to burgers

90 day period

You can argue that the original argument is incorrect because it focused on the wrong aspect of the whole, but the basic idea that the overall behavior is malicious remains correct.

Nothing was debunked. The fact is link is fully capable of giving the rewards to americans as well. Other blockchains have already done so and continue to do so. It's an opinion if that is "malicious" or not, but to me that's kind of irrelevant. It's a stupid decision that will cost the blockchain in the long run, not that it had a bright future anyways.

I never held any link, but if I did and was promised something, then that was taken away because of my nationality, you bet I would be selling instantly. You would have to be an omegacuck9000 to still hold link as an burger at this point

The fact is link is fully capable of giving the rewards to americans as well.

US citizens missed out on 19 billion in airdrops because of US regulatory enforcement.

Clearly there's a problem that isn't Chainlink's doing, retard.

Limiting it to 90 days is their doing. Why not leave it open until things become clear? Does it take extra effort or cost on their part to not close the claim window.

Why not leave it open until things become clear?

You fuddies have been crying about Chainlink being too cautious for years, and now this lmao

Like I said, you're just looking for excuses to whine.

Forcing a choice between getting what is promised and not violating their TOS and potentially being excluded in the future isn't an "excuse" to whine.

You're right, they should wait another three years.

Why not? What's the actual downside of doing so for them?

You've proven nothing except how much of a cuck faggot you are. Link is fully capable of giving the rewards as promised to americans, period. Stating a number doesn't change that. Other blockchains have already done it. No one in the U.S gov has told link not to do it. You have no argument.

Link is fully capable of giving the rewards as promised to americans, period.

So were the issuers of the 19 billion. But they didn't. Wonder why

To be honest none of this even matters, link really doesn't have any future. Any americans holding the coin should be grateful they spit in your face, should be a wake up call to stop being so retarded. Anyone buying link shouldn't be allowed to vote or own property.

, but as soon as that's debunked

wait how exactly was that debunked in this thread? please quote the line that debunked this

why the fuck do they need a 90 day window? my only guess is so they can then confiscate the coins back for themselves.

there is 100% not going to be legal clarity within 90 days. the crypto bill failed last week and proabably won't be re-attempted until next year at the earliest

It doesn't matter why. That's not the point. But i noticed you picked up those goalposts very quickly ; ) my only point is that they are fully capable of doing so. and the only logical reaction is that, as an american you are a faggot cuck if you hold the coin, thats really all there is to it.

This is the only part that bugs me. I'd be fine waiting if they didn't just light my fucking rewards on fire after 90 days.

It doesn't matter why.

19 billion says otherwise

how exactly was that debunked in this thread?

here

The parties that need to actually change the current climate

what the fuck are you talking about holy shit "current climate" what a little snake

so changing the president who is pro crypto and launches his own memecoins and firing gensler and bringing in atkins who was a goddamn advisor to crypto companies isn't "changing the climate"

also

judicial branch (the courts)

yeah what court has ruled that airdrops make a crypto a security?

all you heard from the chainlink team is how close they are with people in dc and how good trump will be for them, and here they are almost half way through the year and they're slowly unveiling they still can't do anything because of gensler's ghost

dude, stop posting. the 90-day claim window is a legitimate concern, not just rando fud. the answer to why is absolutely of consequence for whether CLL is acting maliciously, which i believe they are not. they have never acted maliciously in the past, i don't see why they would now.

here's my two cents: they're not acting maliciously, they're satisfying whatever agreement they had with SxT. i could totally see SxT insisting on a finite window to claim the tokens they committed. for all we know, a claim window is built into every build participant's agreement.

everyone has to manage their own risk. i've claimed 3 of my 4 staked wallets, ensuring i have at least one unsullied address should the worst come to pass.

If $19 billion worth of airdrops are withheld from US citizens, then it's not just a Chainlink problem, is it?

Nothing in that post you replied to has anything to do with the 90 days lmao

US citizens missed out on 19 billion in airdrops because of US regulatory enforcement.

you didn't even read your own article did you... the title missed a decimal point dog

look at you just blindly quoting it... guys like this exemplify the stupidity of a cult member.

this is why i laugh when i get told ai is coming for my job. no one has a brain anymore

imagine confidently saying something while your numbers are off by 17 BILLION

>how exactly was that debunked in this thread?

here

HAHAHAHAHAHAH you mean the article you didn't even read faggot

plus why the fuck are you posting something about an old sec regime exactly?

what court cases did the sec win again

true, i just replied to your last post rather than linking a dozen others. but here you are again arguing semantics rather than addressing the point.

correct

also think about like when a fast food company puts an expiration date on coupons

they want the 90 day period to expire so they can reclaim the tokens

the US is a huge percentage of link's userbase so think about how much this saves them and sxt

this pasta keeps aging better and better
The year is 2030 -

link staking 1.0 has been released, although build rewards are still "coming soon", "we are still recovering from Gary Gensler's operation chokepoint in 2022"

rory's update on discord: hey guys, thanks for your patience, we're finalizing a few final items and then hoping to release preliminary build for select users by q1 '2031 at the latest

a marine asks if the build rewards have been accruing for stakers this whole time...he's immediately kicked and banned

rory then reposts the website faq reminding community members they will be sued by chainlink labs for negative comments

linkdrake chimes in on how it's ridiculous people expect a return in under 15 years of holding something

link price: $9, market cap at all time high

So quote me where I argued anything at all about the 90 days.

the title missed a decimal point

No, it didn't.

Kek