Link stink

Question

Link stink

Okay fellow stinkyheads, let's break this shit down.
If you still aren't holding any stinkies, this is your LAST chance to do so.

What happens in 2025?

After 7 years of nothing but hope and cope happening, we are about to get tangible results.
The partnership between swift (the thing that a big chunk of world's money flows through) and chainlink will run global trials for processing swift-crypto interactions through chainlink.
Think will either moon or kill link.
If the trial goes well and swift stays with link, thats it, moon guaranteed, link will skyrocket to 3 digits and never come back down, 4 digits not out of the question either in few years, unless all of crypto dies.
BUT
If for some reason the beta trial doesn't go well, or the bank decides to not keep using stinkies as their blockchain gateway, then it's game fucking OVER. Link will plummet to single digits and never recover. The small finance projects that will keep using link are specks of dust compared to swift, they mean nothing, it ALL hinges on swift.
So, your best on links hinges entirely on if you believe the swift partnership will play out or not.

This is it. The finish line. We are either boarding a rocket ship or crashing and burning, there is nothing in between.

Good luck fellow stinky frens.

3 digits is fud

If there were any chance of Link pumping, market makers and whales would be all over it. Instead, they're buying memes.

, they're buying memes.

Exactly.
Crypto bros only understand hype trends.
So they trade around hype coins like btc or doge, but not chainlink.
The reason is that chainlink has no hype around it, it is many years old, the price is flat, it appears dead. It completely flies under crypto bro radar, since they only do surface analysis.
However if you look under the hood, you realize what i said in the OP hold true. If you want details try some of the crypto tubers, and not the retarded ones just shilling whatever shitcoin meme is now popular the once that actually go in depth into the technologies and partnerships for each coin they talk about.
The reason why people aren't buying link like crazy (yet) is because
- they are tards who simply missed what is about to happen
- they know, don't want to take the gamble, since in case the swift thing doesn't pan out then link will actually become a dead shitcoin full of cope baggies like cardano

Swift isn't the only massive institutional entity looking at Chainlink, you know.

The reason is that chainlink has no hype around it

... is because it's not allowed to pump

It is the only one that matters, because if swift decides no to go forward with link, any of the other financial giants will follow their lead and drop link as well.
So it doesn't change anything, except the potential top being even higher, but the risk remains same, if swifts stays, moon, if they don't, dead shitcoin.

DTCC, Euroclear, Fidelity, ANZ, BNY Mellon, Franklin Templeton, ... don't matter

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Please let's keep any delulu cope out of here, none of that means shit, the only concrete partnership is swift and it will affect all the others going in or not.

the only concrete partnership is swift

Literally all of the names I mentioned (and many more) all have concrete partnerships with Chainlink.
Go neck.

massive cope detected itt shit ticker (LINK) is almost at single digits already. its going minus in two weeks

Partnerships don't mean shit if they aren't acted upon, the only concrete here is swift which is about to actually run a real world test in 2025.
All those other big boys will likely simply turn and leave if swift does.
But I am optimistic and think the swift test will pan out and then everyone will be in. If i thought it was likely to fail i would not be holding a link bag.

My life savings is in this Anon Babble memecoin I CANNOT afford LINK to die

My life savings

That would be quite the silly thing to do anon. never bet what you can't afford to lose.
That being said, if you hold 1000 stinkies you should be just fine, nobody's life will be ruined by losing $10k (well, less, stinky won't go to zero if swift flops, maybe to $5)

the only concrete here is swift

I just told you that literally all of the names I mentioned (and many more) all have concrete partnerships with Chainlink.

You have some kind of severe learning deficiency.

technically it all hinges on the dtcc, but if swift trials go poorly then dtcc miracle is even harder.
swift can get us to $100-$250 but any realistic chance at 1k is almost 100% reliant on real results from the dtcc

Franklin Templeton is using PoR for their tokenized funds in production

fidelity international has had 50 million dollars on chain paying for chainlink services since march of this year. this same company had representatives at smartcon talking about how that was just a trial and that they want to add hundreds of millions soon.

token not needed. oracles not needed. 0 dollars per link by 2030. eric schmidt rugged you for ukraine

have sex incel

Let's not fight over brainlet semantics, we all agree that swift is the first domino that will trigger all the other ones, without it we get nothing, with it we get the lambo we all deserve.
2025 will be a very exciting year for stinky bag holders
If things go extremely well then in few years we could see the $1000 mark, so in order to truly make it you would need at least 1000stinkies in your bag, which is a considerable investment right now, but everyone should at the very least hold 100 (just in case)

It dumps when BTC pumps because C Labs sells as soon as they see a pump.

Don't worry anon once the live colab with taylor happens NOTHING will be able to contain the link explosion anymore
Unless the entire crypto sphere die, we will see large gains
just pray that some retarded banking boomer doesn't get cold feet and tries to pull out, but that should not be an issue as there is not really any big risk for the banks in using link

we all agree that swift is the first domino

Or DTCC.
Or Euroclear.
Or BNY Mellon.
etc.

Or the first domino has already fallen in the form of Franklin Templeton, Fidelity, Sygnum, ArkInvest, ...

I won't be able to reach 1k by 2025 it's literally over for me

No. The first proper live collab is swift in 2025. All those other partnerships are vaporware until swift in 2025 raises or sinks the link ship.

1k in 2025 is highly unlikely, if all goes well count with low triple digit bottom

The first proper live collab is swift in 2025

Maybe.

All those other partnerships are vaporware

You're violently retarded.

2025 will be anywhere from $80-$350. 2027 is most likely the $1k timeline.

the only thing that matters is Swift!

no! The only thing that matters is DTCC!!

Why not both?
Why not all the other institutions as well?

why are quadrillions worth more than billions?

gee i don't know.

Banks are buying memes

no they're not. you're getting mixed up with retail, kid. it's retards like you buying memes

No you have to pick one. And you can't pick one that's already been picked by someone else.
Also your sister has cooties.

one is bigger than the other

therefore it is the only one that matters

What the absolute fuck am I reading.

Also, Swift handles like 50 million messages per day, I’m sure it’s equal to or greater than DTCC in terms of value transacted.

How long do we have to buy

I’m sure it’s equal to or greater than DTCC in terms of value transacted

HAHAHAHAHHAAHHA. I love link and I hope the swift shit works out but like come on it's not even in the same league as the dtcc.

Swift: $150 trillion per year.

DTCC: $2.5 quadrillion per year.

one is bigger

therefore the smaller one doesn’t count

You can’t be underage on here.
Also source

waaa waaa spoonfeed me

fine. idiot.

forbes.com/sites/zennonkapron/2023/05/23/why-swift-remains-indispensable-for-cross-border-payments/

dtcc.com/annuals/2022/performance/

That's only standard messages, not including securities.
And once again for the braincells in the back: nobody said DTCC wasn't bigger. The point is that one being bigger doesn't cancel out the one that's smaller.

nobody said DTCC wasn't bigger

read "I’m sure it’s equal to or greater than DTCC in terms of value transacted."

Maybe it is if you add the securities.
And even his point was like I said: one being bigger doesn't cancel out the rest. That's playground talk.

well technically months, but there is no guarantee the price will stay as low as it is for that long since as people start to realize what is about to happen and more crypto tubers start hopping on this, the price could start going up earlier than we expect. Make sure you buy in by the end of year at the latest.

is token needed?
no?
thought so.

CCIP... dead on arrival

none of those have anything to do with the funding coin, which the market fully understands

you know who also had tons of partnerships? Enron

Despite its internal culture of obfuscation, Enron projected an illusion of transparency, largely through a sophisticated public relations strategy. The company's charismatic leaders, Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling, were often seen on financial networks and at industry conferences, extolling Enron's virtues and its role as a market innovator.

The company's annual reports and press releases were masterclasses in euphemism and grandiosity. Technical jargon and ambiguous language created an aura of complexity that dissuaded scrutiny. Questions were deflected with a common refrain: Enron was too innovative to be understood by the uninitiated.

Nice fud disguised as a bull post. Everyone knows swift needs chainlink. They have no choice but to use link. It's the only suitable oracle solution for high value contacts so either swift decides not to invest in the blockchain and everything in defi dies or they use link.

either swift decides not to invest in the blockchain and everything in defi dies or they use link.

so literally the same thing i said then...
Apply yourself anon.

none of those have anything to do with the funding coin

Every single thing they (will) do with Chainlink DONs will require the token.

(IF)t hey (will) do with

and it will only be IF swift pans out, once again, ot all hinges on swift, they will not touch link if swift says linky is stinky

You'd have to be a retard to believe that swift won't integrate blockchain tech. You implied that swift will look for another solution if they don't pick chainlink. I'm saying that chainlink is the only viable solution and Sergey was headhunter by the heads of swift to build chainlink just for them. Low value contracts don't need to be highly secure. High value contracts do and that's where chainlink comes in.

It's way more insane to think there is even a small chance that swift will admit that blockchain sucks and they made a bad investment.

none of that gibberish makes the funding coin accrue value

nah kid... it just doesn't work anymore, you need a new strategy (see the chart)

If it was this much 100% assured, then everyone would have huge link bags already and link would be at $100 at least.
But it's not and it won't be till 2025, the chances are very good but in no way guaranteed.

If it was this much 100% assured, then everyone would have huge link bags already and link would be at $100 at least.

Even a remote chance of this happening should've made Link be $100 at least.

Well part of the fact is isn't is as the kids say today

skill issue

chainlink is very complicated in what it is and what it does, it is much more complicated than something like bitcoin, which is simply digital money
so the cryptobros look at link as just "another coin competing with BTC lol" not realizing its true purpose.
Now luckily, we here on /beez/ are no brainlets and see the potential clearly and secured our bags in time for the 2025 ride
In late 2025 expect to see link spammend all over cryptobro social media as much or even more than btc/eth combined

Well part of the fact is isn't is as

shit, probably had a mini stroke when i was typing that

None of that is why Link didn't boost to triple digits on all that recent Swift news alone.

It is.

No, it isn't.
There isn't a single normie on the planet who understands even the most basic concept of blockchain, but Bitcoin still did what it did.

Okay you seem to lack reading comprehension, so once more
They don't need to know how BTC work to correctly know it's "digital money"
but the problem is these people think chainlink is the same thing as BTC, or dogecoin
that is why they aren't buying link, coz they think link is trying to replace btc/etc/doge/ltc whatever, they simply don't understand that link does.
If BTC is gold, and LTC silver, they think chainlink is trying to be bronze, they simply don't know chainlink will be the truck that is transporting these precious metals.

they think link is trying to replace btc

That's what they think of literally any crypto. Doesn't stop them from pumping those, does it?