chainlink tries to access blockchain liquidity
ripple won't give them a license
it's over
Chainlink tries to access blockchain liquidity
Can somebody explain to me how have the kikes at Ripple managed to brainwash and lobotomize these people so thoroughly?
Its hilarious and sad at the same time. Like, BIS, SWIFT, Euroclear, and hundreds others are screaming "YES WE WORK WITH CHAINLINK AND CHAINLINK ONLY" and you have crippletards mumbling "here is why this is bullish for Ripple, it will be all uncovered soon, hodl"
And the fucking kikes at the top are literally giving away their investors money to the nigger witch Kamala, top fucking kek
Elaborate reverse spoonfeed request, ill bite.
Yes link for ORACLES from old system to new blockchain and back. Link is not issuing cbdcs, link is not tokenizing liquidity, link does not own a ''superdex'' for liquidity, link does not provide custody.
Why do linkies always think they own the whole blockchain space? Link needs other chains, as SN stated himself, the future will be multichain. Link is an ERC20 token on ETH, nothing more nothing less.
The donation to the democrats is 1000 IQ, now blue and red sides both have something to gain with the lawsuit being over and gensler fired.
link is a system and technology. owning link (ERC20) *might* make you profit in terms of dividens paid out of this system, if this system is widely used
they live on twitter and are mired in a sunk cost fallacy. obviously stupid and lazy and never try to understand anything outside their hypenomics. Ripple is fucked lol. Their new stablecoin is now the cool big thing, but this was never why XRP was praised to begin with, there was never a demand or focuse vision for RLUSD. Ripple is trying to keep their ponzi going so they're seeking opportunity with tether FUD and meme coins. It's honestly sad. I know guys who convinced their families to pour in all their savings, some dudes retiring expecting the flippy switchy. they're fucked. i tried to warn them.
They aren't "working with" chainlink. One dude from their digital innovation department gets paid by chainlink for going to their conferences and to appear by name on chainlink press releases.
holy fucking cope HAHAHAHAHA
I bet you patted yourself on the back for those wasted trips. Why does anyone have to use XRP over other faster and securer blockchain ledgers? linkie this, linkie that, but at least they hold a real standard while you're a faggot who lives on this board touting XRP because you're stuck holding huge bags of trash.
The donation was embarrassing just like you.
They are trips of truth you salty nigger. Spit your venom and ad hominem all you want, not 1 single argument. You fuckers are so salty ripple is still a top 10 coin WITH a lawsuit.
Again asking to be spoonfed again. Fine ill bite.
Give me some examples of similar faster, securer 'blockchain ledgers'? With the same connections, similar heavyweights on their team and similar partnerships. That also have institutional grade custody?
You could pick ripple because they have been running with near100% uptime since 2018.
Ripple partnered with the Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan to pilot a CBDC using Ripple's CBDC Private Ledger
In 2021, Ripple began working with the Republic of Palau to explore a USD-backed digital currency strategy.
They also worked with BOA, SBI holdings, are in the digital pound foundation. digital euro association, digital dollar project, GME remittance, national bank of egypt, Montenegro, Colombia. And thats just a google search. They are under every financial rock but you fuckers are so dense you refuse to see what is happening in front of your eyes.
when the masses need a hero one will be provided for them
tRiPs Of tRuTh
Ripple earnestly pushes hypenomics, that's why its in the top 10. It was touted as the Swift replacement, the big bank ledger, etc. It's none of that now. It's a sad, lukewarm soup of empty promises and failures hemorrhaging because of the lawsuit.
Use your fucking brain and go on coinmarketcap and go search the plethora of other blockchains and compare them to XRPL. It does not need to be used over others. It's not the fastest, not even close. Nor is it even the most secure, again not even close. You can take your fricken connections and shove them up your ass. It obviously means nothing, and XRP is overpriced as it is and you will watch it fall because NO ONE USES IT. They've worked with companies, they've paid them to use it, and most if not all of them walked away flustered or unimpressed by centralization or costs. They're not the only one being experimented with, it's just that Ripple made a strong but failed push for adoption.
FUCKING BHUTAN AND PALAU HO HO HO BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA GET READY FOLKS
you're the one who is dense. fuck you, go live on another board and shit it up with your cope you fucking loser.
xrp schizos get the last laff....
How many times have you retards pivoted on the narrative? For your own sake, please let go of your bags and buy BTC. Not even LINK, if you are sour. Just get the boomer coin and at least break even for this cycle man.
What was the news article that read something like "Ripple might work with SWIFT" and the source of it all was a twitter bagholder?
Sunk cost poor retards making up stuff. The same stuff that the institutions are telling "why yes we are already in production with Chainlink". Holy fucking shit id kill myself if I was a XRPtard.
y-you see.. they are being PAID to work with Chainlink for YEARS!!
Mmmmhm yess, delicious cope here. Keep it coming.
Link is not issuing cbdcs, link is not tokenizing liquidity, link does not own a ''superdex'' for liquidity, link does not provide custody.
i anticipated that some pretty retarded xrpaypigs would wander outside of their general to engage in these kinds of mental gymnastics during and after sibos, but these posts are absolutely unhinged
link is the protagonist of sibos this year for good reason - because it is confirmed, 100 percent set in stone at this point, that it will be the industry standard oracle for legacy financial institutions that will be seeking to deploy such services in blockchain environments. it does not and has never aimed to provide such services itself, because it will be the protocol that enables others to do this in a secure and tamper-proof way with almost any kind of data or asset they can think of
it has been tested thoroughly, and with obvious enthusiasm by said institutions, which you would understand if you were actually capable of following along with anything outside of mobile videos posted by crypto twitter niggers and karens who have ended up living in their cars since they bought ripple
ripple has no ability to allow or veto anything outside of its own vaporware chain using a "licensing" process, or a craig wright tier patent claim regarding the concept of "blockchain liquidity"
now that you have been put in your place, just fuck off back to your poorfag containment thread where you belong along with all of your wonderful "sources" such as screencaps of your own youtube comments, you petrol-huffing prairie nigger
If it was all hype, they are very good at hype, thats for sure. At the very least links shill team and pr team (currently reading this) can learn some from them.
The lawsuit is over in the sense that xrp in and of itself is not a security. they are appealing the size of the fine, but you are too retarded to actually use a search engine.
It seems your brain is off as the whole ramble was not a single argument. Its a reddit tier post with loads of cope. Just the fact they launching a stable on their network and the loads of licenses they have already makes 99% of shitcoins fall of.
More ad hominem, more cope, more seethe, 0 arguments. It took you more then an hour to fabricate this literal verbal diarrhea?
Kek pivoted, why cant you comprehend a chain can do more than 1 thing?
I saw this article recently that shows XRPies losing faith. Never seen anything like it before. Is the cult having an epiphany?
However, the Chainlink-Swift partnership now makes that prospect more uncertain for XRP.
At least with xrp you wouldv crabbed. With link you actually lost money kek.
Wall of text to compare an oracle provider to an entity providing cbdcs, smart contracts and cross border settlements. You niggers keep comparing apples to pears in a fancy way, absolute mongrels lmao
I outlined for you why XRPL is an inflated joke and you gloss over everything I said and then act as if I said nothing at all. Your reddit spacing gaslighting does not work on me. And you have the nerve to cry about ad hominum. Your whole post is ad hominum. No one walks away from what you said thinking the heckin xrp dudes are so smart and right! I'd sell my bags immediately after reading what you wrote.
No one uses XRPL. It will not replace Swift. It's in litigation. It's not the fastest nor most secure blockchain on the market. It's effectively way overvalue and kept alive by hypenomics. Go ride your RLUSD cope into the sunset and go live on another board. You lost, haha
But you said nothing. You ask me to go on cmc and do the work for you. Its ad hominEm btw, because half of the post is comprised of you flinging shit and acting like its an argument. thats the definition of ad hominem you jew.>>
now show me the superior legers/chains that you speak of
No one uses XRPL. It will not replace Swift. It's in litigation. It's not the fastest nor most secure blockchain on the market. It's effectively way overvalue and kept alive by hypenomics. Go ride your RLUSD cope into the sunset and go live on another board. You lost, haha
it is being used livenet.xrpl.org
litigation about to be over
never claimed to be the fasest, it does have 4 second finality
never claimed to be the most secure but link proof that it has been hacked
overvalued is typical salt cope, they just bought institutional grade custody for 250 milion, thats probably for their not wanted chain and not wanted solutions right
the stable is coming and there is not shit you can do about it but cope
x.com
How long do you think brad can continue the grift?
No one uses XRPL. It will not replace Swift. It's in litigation. It's not the fastest nor most secure blockchain on the market. It's effectively way overvalue and kept alive by hypenomics. Go ride your RLUSD cope into the sunset and go live on another board. You lost, haha
I should also mention the team dumps tokens on your heads kek
thats bullish
quoting the financial jew article.
somehow an argument.
Theres another fud article going round from forbes about other cryptos being useless chains. Its them signaling what to buy to others from the hook nosed tribe. Still not an argument kek.
thats bullish
what part?
>No one uses XRPL. It will not replace Swift. It's in litigation. It's not the fastest nor most secure blockchain on the market. It's effectively way overvalue and kept alive by hypenomics. Go ride your RLUSD cope into the sunset and go live on another board. You lost, haha
I should also mention the team dumps tokens on your heads kek
ODL is only 1 product that they discontinued. key takeaway: they have more products and services. Its also from 2020 kek, old news from the lawsuit. That ruled that its not a security kek
the ''dumping'' is according to an escrow that has very specific locking and unlocking requirements, again old fud and proof of retardedness
Engineers that worked on BTC
the ledger was concieved before the actual company
this is literally again the same fud from in 2017
>>No one uses XRPL. It will not replace Swift. It's in litigation. It's not the fastest nor most secure blockchain on the market. It's effectively way overvalue and kept alive by hypenomics. Go ride your RLUSD cope into the sunset and go live on another board. You lost, haha
>I should also mention the team dumps tokens on your heads kek
Ah yes the price suppression bots, kind of defeats the argument that there is no demand or use. And its very similar to the linkies aying btc dumps when link pumps.
Its also proof there is a possibility of a flip the switch moment, they just turn off the bots.
again 2017 posts. what did link do in 2017? Write a whitepaper?
>>No one uses XRPL. It will not replace Swift. It's in litigation. It's not the fastest nor most secure blockchain on the market. It's effectively way overvalue and kept alive by hypenomics. Go ride your RLUSD cope into the sunset and go live on another board. You lost, haha
>I should also mention the team dumps tokens on your heads kek
haha you have cope for everything
I own link too
You are the HAHAHAHA poster right?
We already met in many XSGs. The name of your screens and way you type gives it away. OR all fuddies pull from the same fud drive.
>>No one uses XRPL. It will not replace Swift. It's in litigation. It's not the fastest nor most secure blockchain on the market. It's effectively way overvalue and kept alive by hypenomics. Go ride your RLUSD cope into the sunset and go live on another board. You lost, haha
>I should also mention the team dumps tokens on your heads kek
link vs xrp cults is like letting two special ed classes from opposing high schools fight each other
muh heckin crypto cults!
Go back to twitter and wave your gay nft avatar. XRP tards bring this upon themselves and deserve to be executed.
Engineers that worked on BTC
the ledger was concieved before the actual company
this is literally again the same fud from in 2017
lol ok now I know youre just trolling.
Let's take a different approach anon. Please describe to the class what security in blockchain means.
seems to me like both Link and XRPL are necessary for the system they're building and rolling out, they are both tech providers for legacy players updating their systems and infrastructure for a digital t-zero economic system
i'd watch that. special olympics x UFC
seems like in the context he's referring to, it means "resilience of the network to attacks on its integrity or ability to function in a trustless and trustworthy manner"
what do i win
banks: "we will send tokenized assets across our private chains through Chainlink"
cripplets: "no no they won't actually send tokenized assets, they will send XRP instead"
The whole point of creating tokenized assets is to be able to easily send them.
Why the flying fuck would they convert those tokenized assets to XRP first?
Your rude awakening happened a long time ago, but somehow you slept through it.
Link is not issuing cbdcs, link is not tokenizing liquidity, link does not own a ''superdex'' for liquidity, link does not provide custody.
Why do linkies always think they own the whole blockchain space?
That is correct. And how is this security achieved by any given blockchain network?
What was the news article that read something like "Ripple might work with SWIFT" and the source of it all was a twitter bagholder?
These.
timestabloid.com
timestabloid.com
timestabloid.com
linkie lunch status
EATEN
linkies BTFO
Chainlink is not only blockchain agnostic; it is also bloc agnostic! Sergey <3 NATO, AND SmartCon is proceeding in Hong Kong on the heals of the latest BRICS summit.
It would be an awful shame if something tragic were to happen to particular people and their most closely loved ones, like if the yacht or helicopter or private jet the HNIC+family were aboard on vacation were suddenly lost with no survivors.
Real shame!
So, let's all hope that the good folks over at Ripple do the right thing to make sure that such horrible fates don't befall any of them or the people they care about.
t. literally under fbi investigation in connection with several high-profile assassinations worldwide *and* very minor nice metacryptocelebrity & living meme who's loved & adored by all fellow true linkmarines unironically btw also completely innocent or at least not guilty of any violent crimes whatsoever
But, seriously, guize? Do you think Ripple *won't* profit nicely by licensing Chainlink? C'MON! Ripple CANNOT compete against LINK; best possible course for Ripple is to just license SmartContract.com at an exhorbitant lease rate with all kinds of perks like VIP CCIP preferential status, et al...
...Ripple would be Riptarded to drop the ball out of spite and *not* earn hundreds of millions of dollars in *free* annual revenue by tacking their own little cut onto the fees the Chainlink ecosystem charges users (inb4 zer0).
You know that I'm right. Ripple will "bend the knee" to Chainlink (as already planned)... things just need to get, uh, "better" first.
everything my person expresses or implies online is solely for common amusement in very niche corners of the internet where only those with enough common sense to discern my obviously non-serious creative writing from the sorts of insane statements made by completely unhinged maniacs before they break the law so please just go back to protecting america from real enemies foreign & domestic okay thanks bye
LINK<
Yes link for ORACLES from old system to new blockchain and back. Link is not issuing cbdcs, link is not tokenizing liquidity, link does not own a ''superdex'' for liquidity, link does not provide custody.
Correct
Why do linkies always think they own the whole blockchain space? Link needs other chains, as SN stated himself, the future will be multichain.
Correct
Link is an ERC20 token on ETH, nothing more nothing less.
Link is a currency that has wrapped versions on other chains. Also it's an ERC677 to be precise. You can approve Link and transfer it in the same transaction.
That being said, none of this explains why anyone would bet on Ripple who has been years harping on working with banks. Banks are running their own chains and are tokenizing their own assets and issuing their own CBDCs. Where does Ripple come into play?