Does anyone have a screenshot? Also did they delete it because BTC started pumping or because they got a cease and desist from Visa?
Chainlink tweeted something about Visa tokenization platform then deleted the post
Not looking good desu
fag
it's in the other thread
Thanks anon
here's the article it linked to
cointelegraph.com
why did they delete it, is the question? is it too much of an early admission that Visa will use CCIP for interoperability? i mean, it's pretty obvs they would, but maybe they were saving some official announcement for Smartcon or something?
giga bullish that they had to delete it
it's the confirmation of the hiding strategy a la Eric Schmidt
How many link to make it
10k to make it by 2030
I think 1k suicide might even become a make it stack at this point anon
time will tell
There's not a single thing in this article or in anything else presented that suggests Chainlink has anything to do with this.
Social media interns who assume a connection when there isn't one so Rory has to get them to delete is heckin BULLISH marines! Two more weeks!
There's not a single thing in this article or in anything else presented that suggests Chainlink has anything to do with this
i know there's nothing in the cointelegraph article my point is that if chainlink are tweeting about it then they're almost certainly involved. the deleting of it only adds to the suspicion. breadcrumbs, anon. no need to get all upset and fuddy
we'll know for sure after the guy in charge of the entire project speaks at smartcon
that visa guy is a speaker at smartcon no?
cope stinkie
if anything, it's bearish
dgaf about your permabullish mental gymnastics, tweeting something like this only to promptly delete it cannot in any way be interpreted as something positive
reread the deleted post again anon
there was no statement by chainlink regarding a partnership, connection or CCIP usage
they just reported about Visas interest in tokenized assets
you're right, it could just be they posted it ahead of the official announcement and had to take it down
okay boss
that visa guy is a speaker at smartcon
he sure is but don't tell these fuddies in here. they'll tell you it means there's defo no connection kek
There's literally zero reason (morally, legally, ...) for Visa to send a cease and desist for that tweet.
It contained zero contentious implications or statements, and basically simply linked to a Coindesk article.
Chainlink themselves decided to delete it.
Why wouldn't you delete revealing that visa will use and enjoy for free and the token will be relegated to useless shit with no value allowed over srgs limits.
from a fundamentals standpoint, how would this accrue value to the Link token? Are they giving Link holders stock in Visa?
So, i guess we're all in agreement then that it looks like VTAP will defo use CCIP for interoperability. I guess the next question is, what other Chainlink services will they need to run the platform safely and effectively? I guess Nischint Sanghavi will clear that up at Smartcon. I'm getting excited already!
exactly my point anon it was plain and simple reporting, neutral coverage of some coinbase article
Visa are getting involved with CBDC’s, they will need to send them across private and public blockchains, they will need to use CCIP to do this. In order to use CCIP they will have to pay gas fees. They can pay in Link or anything else but with a 10% extra charge. Anything else they pay in will be converted into Link.
JFC keep up
I suppose they'll need proof of reserves too, for sure, right? what other ones do you think they'll need? good fun, chewing the fat like this
yeah in such a scenario they would use plenty of links features
The token has been instrumental to Chainlink products since the very beginning.
No node has ever done anything on any mainnet without it.
10% extra charge?
What freaking planet are you on?
Yes, it’s a 10% surcharge for not paying in Link
if chainlink are tweeting about it then they're almost certainly involved
You have to be new to chainlink. Like, within the past 3 months new. You have a mountain of examples from the past 7 years of why this is explicitly false
So Chainlink Labs is a news aggregator now. Wonderful.
This is cope at its finest
ok but why this not accrue value to the token?
Is that actually true? Assuming it is, why would someone not pay in Link? 10% is a huge charge
why would someone not pay in Link
You're starting to get it
I was seriously asking. Hypothetically, what is the answer? If you're going to pay instead in Eth for instance, why? It's just one extra step to convert Eth to Link and the associated fees would be substantially lower than the 10% extra cost.
It is true. If you don't convert your fees into Link, they do it for you and hence the 10% charge. Basically a service fee.
why this not accrue value to the token?
The value of a crypto is decided in the marketplace. Not on the backend.
10k will be fuck you money by then
All references to interopearability have dissapeared
ifykyk
they may do this eventually chainlinkgod an internet oracle expert has confirmed that it will be two more weeks until a team can begin work on this novel mechanism
Wait what?
What are you talking about, they've been doing it for a long time already.
Assuming it is
It is.
governance.aave.com
Nice try fuddie but this is not the case chainlinkgod internet oracle expert already confirmed it
source pls
point 3 used to be Interoperability, and now it change to Blockchain bla bla ba
but i already gave it to you fuddie
source = chainlinkgod
now he'll go off on a 20pbti rant and completely ignore my post
in the investors 3 oct article still says it
cointelegraph.com
it's still there and there is still mention of interoperability.
avocado's so annoying.
might be something to discuss and instead they lie.
''Bridging blockchains: The growing tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) ecosystem spans various permissioned and public blockchain networks. Visa aims to facilitate interoperability across them.''
What you're referring to is that there is no automatic conversion yet.
But they've been converting alternative assets to link tokens for a long time now.
They had to, because nodes can't work with anything but the link token.
You forgot the part where the LINK conversion comes from the uncirculating supply and not the market. Then when the uncirculating supply runs out, CLL simply mints more. Cope stinkie.
The chainlink contract doesn’t have a mint function. Try harder.
he doesn't know they can just make one up
Uh oh stinkie
What you're referring to
nice try fuddie but chainlinkgod alluded to it. reread my post.
for a long time now
lol source?
They had to, because nodes can't work with anything but the link token.
nodes need to learn about token diversity because aave has bags to offload gotcha
token diversity is our strength. there is no automatic mechanism. two more weeks until tokens learn to get along.
2024 and they are still using the shadow link conspiracy....
chainlinkgod alluded to it
He referred to the automatic conversion.
lol he's ackually implying chainlink will be just like ETH and the team will just mint memes to fund their next scam
They actually can’t, it’s a fixed supply that acts deflationary meaning its scarcity is maintained over time.
The structure is a standard feature in loads of crypto to prevent inflationary risks that can devalue the asset.
Try harder.
This. When the uncirculaing supply runs out, they simply enable payments in dogbat instead. Stinkies BTFO
look at those goal posts fly!
chainlinkgod confirmed a team is being assembled to begin work in the future. reread my post
chainlinkgod confirmed a team is being assembled to begin work in the future.
Yes, on the AUTOMATIC conversion.
dogbat is old now boomer try harder. the next memes will be carefully crafted by aging cryptocurrency ogs to appeal to the next generation in the future... future tense
the fact there is no automatic conversion now shows that the link token isn't needed
chainlinkgod confirmed a team is being assembled to begin work in the future.
Yes, on the AUTOMATIC conversion.
Yes, in the FUTURE. Reread my post or take more English lessons rajeet. These Indian Bulgarian halfwits are definitely not the best
Yes, in the FUTURE.
Yes, the automatic conversion is coming in the future.
And until then they're converting manually.
nice try fuddie but in the future VCs will automatically convince projects to sell out via novel smart contract mechanism
The fact that there’s no automatic conversion yet shows us that at some point a large sum of random tokens will be dumped on the market and converted into Link,it will be one of many god candles
Chainlinkgod already confirmed this reread my post anon it is happening in the future. The source is Chainlinkgod and the conversion is not happening automatically it is in fact happening manually
the conversion is not happening automatically it is in fact happening manually
Exactly what I've been telling you.
Now notice that this guy didn't mention automatic or manual, he simply mentioned conversion.
You then replied to him as if he specifically said automatic conversion.
That's called a strawman argument.
Chainlinkgod has been telling both of us because he is the internet oracle expert guy with the original argument not you anon learn to be humble. It is happening in the future chainlinkgod confirms
You then replied to him as if he specifically said automatic conversion
he replied to me then i re-replied to him it is called being social online and is has nothing to do with men made of straw or arguments you have clearly stolen from chainlinkgod and refuse to source
chainlink tweeted
heckin' wwwwoooooooowzers!
nice try fuddie but they already deleted the tweet it never happened no golden record submissions were made
Nothingburger
Cope. Dogbat will be universal gas for the global financial system and will continue to have the thiccest of thicc ass liquidity. Trust the plan. Two more weeks.
It has nothing to do with CCIP. The amount of schizophrenia in this thread is actually disturbing. They deleted it because it was misleading.
x.com
If anything their system would have the same tech as Circles USDC.
USDC's CCTP isn't a bridge, it still needs something like CCIP to actually be able to move USDC cross-chain.
There's at least 12 protocols that plug into CCTP minter. It doesn't need CCIP exclusively to work.
lol i was in at the ICO you dumb fudkekky. pools closed, kid. sorry you missed it.
quite
If anything their system would have the same tech as Circles USDC
Circle use Chainlink kek
circle.com
It doesn't need CCIP exclusively to work.
Oh sure yeah, they could use wormhole instead couldn't they?
two options
1) deleted as misleadingly implied a partnership when were just just posting general news about tokenization
2) deleted as there will be an announcement of a partnership between the two
think 1 is far more likely. but a bit of a streisand effect. all this talk about tokenization IS very bullish for chainlink. now we just see if they can get a piece of the pie
Chainlink always does this. They do it on purpose to generate speculation that 'x is using Chainlink' Look at the timing of the new 'programmable money' short with Sergey, VISA VTAP, and the dude attending upcoming Smartcon from VISA blockchain department. History has shown that it never results to anything. Nothingburger.
CCIP uses CCTP. No amount of lying will ever change this fact.
These also, not to mention the bridges.
Chainlink also did this with the 'digital island marketing' except this time they did do that PoC with Swift. Now we just wait too see if it was elaborate marketing or they really have something in the works for production. My guess is nothing ever happens and it'll be another nothingburgher like usual.
1 is far more likely because they are notorious for trying to latch onto anything in attempt to hype by vague association. A lot of anons itt need a reality check.
It's impossible to tell with them at this point. I'm actually waiting until next year to see if any of it is legit, as Angie Walker mentioned there would be some significant rollouts by then. We will know for certain at that point if we've been scammed or not. At that point I will dump my bags and try to erase this experience from my memory.
Theyre not allowed to buy link its a crypto. Regulatory clarity is needed first. Not that it makes a difference - they can pay in dollars, it gets converted to link and then dumped on the market anyway
i guess circle will just have to convince the rest of the world to use cctp instead of ccip. good luck with that. how are they getting on with Swift?
They aren't competing. I suggest you know what your talking about before responding because it makes you look like a fool.
CCIP uses CCTP
KEK you're a retard.
CCTP isn't a bridge, it needs something like CCIP or it can't go cross chain.
Meanwhile CCIP (or other bridges) don't need CCTP at all to make coins go cross chain.
It's just that Circle forces bridges to use the CCTP attestation API as a formality.
Brainrotted third world monkey.
this. just like that other idiot that was quoting chainlinkgod without actually quoting oracle expert chainlinkgod he looks like a complete fool. Should have just quoted chainlinkgod kid
redpilled based pilled and just quote chainlinkgod pill pilled