What went wrong
What went wrong
idk ask swift, anz, et al
nothing went at all
The fact you even post this just shows how desperate you are.
None of what you mentioned are currently using LINK. Gay little PoC's are not use hence the token price.
Chainlink
Cult vaporware shitcoin.
so ask them not us lmao
p-please sell please please im so tired of having to come here every day to fud, but i dont have any other options because im too dumb to flip burgers at mcgoyslop
nah
go make another 20 fud threads, bitch
pools closed
Why would I ask something i already know the answer to
There is no proof of CCIP working as Sergey intended to this date, no "internet of contracts" no CCIP connection with public/private chains. That's just the observable facts.
nhooo dude thats fud so stop fudding your going to hell waahhhhh
btw, the pool's closed. what went wrong? why aren't you staking?
I don't think you do :3
1) for web3 there's a big issue as ccip can't integrate already deployed tokens. that's why you can't bridge LINK from eth to arbitrum
2) for tradfi it's still too early.
at the end of the day it's all about 2) and it's too early to tell if it will be adopted by them. it's looking very promising but chainlink remain a high risk bet until we see more
then we also need to see the token being used
my hope is we get something concrete from 2) during this bull and get a second speculative wave
ccip works exactly as intended
hence the whole reason why swift dtcc etc are sucking Sergey's dick in conferences and events every other month while they sort out things on their end
b-but i said it wasnt working so... so SELL
nah
anyway, you're done here
go make another 20 fud threads, bitch
herbs
???
They aren’t sucking him off.
Its employees of the fucking innovation departments in these institutions, as best, being paid to attend whatever chainlink pay for.
Get it right baggie
and then everyone clapped
There is a turd floating in the pool.
Is this internet of contracts in the room with us right now?
Its employees of the fucking innovation departments in these institutions
Biggest cope of the fucking century
hence the token price
Suppression.
Massive, blatant, long-term, predictable suppression.
There's your "hence the price".
no, the biggest cope of the century would be linkies unironically believing those partnerships are anything meaningful
the second biggest cope has to be the schizophrenic suppression theory
cope seethe and dilate, mumbai shill
partnerships with the biggest financial players in the world aren't meaningful
perfectly timed dumps we can see and predict with our own faces aren't happening
also men are women
it's a partership with teeny tiny tech departments of said financial players, and not the players themselves
schizo babble about cherry picked charts
men are women
the only person claiming that itt is you
not buying your bags, Ranjeet
partership with teeny tiny tech departments of said financial players, and not the players themselves
Notice how it says "SWIFT unlocks", "SWIFT can provide", "part of SWIFT's ongoing work", "SWIFT released".
etc.
Pay particular attention to the bottom paragraph where it says "Working with Chainlink, SWIFT has successfully demonstrated".
Notice also how this is on Swift's main website, among the main news items.
Notice how it does not say "a tiny tech department of Swift" anywhere.
How does this affect the native token: LINK.
The chart tho....
How does this affect the native token: LINK.
Better question is how it affects Bitcoin.
Classic correlation does not equql causation, buddy.
Doesn't matter if it's a coincidence or on purpose.
What matters is it has been happening for many years, and it explains why the Link price never gathered any momentum from all its massive news.
Cope
Looks a lot like ETH.
And ETH wasn't suppressed.
Looks a lot like ETH.
And ETH wasn't suppressed.
Literally no resembelence. ETHBTC actually curved and went up shy of the ATH, LINKBTC is dumping kek.
Literally no resembelence
lmao
ETHBTC actually curved and went up shy of the ATH
Yes, 5 years after its blow-off top ATH.
Link's blow-off top ATH was only 4 years ago.
Nigger eth holders had already made it two times by then don't even start trying to compare tired of your gaslighting shit
ETH's top against Bitcoin was seven years ago.
Did you know that?
Link's was only four years ago.
LINKBTC is dumping and will contiue doing that, dipshit
LINKBTC is dumping
Yes, it's been dumping for four years.
Meanwhile ETHBTC has been dumping for SEVEN years.
and LINK has been dumping even HARDER against BTC
keep screeching about your fake partnerships
LINK has been dumping even HARDER against BTC
No. Both lost nearly exactly 90% from ATH to the subsequent low.
ETH: 0.16 to 0.016
Link: 0.0017 to 0.00017
fake partnerships
You know you can go to the respective swift, dtcc, arkinvest etc. websites and check gor yourself, right?
You're a fucking idiot.
There's no suppression, it's simple lack of demand for the token. Stop gaslighting gullible retards on biz, I would know because I used to be one.
SOL has massive inflation, why does it still pump? Because there demand outweighs the inflation. Same thing with ETH when it pumped in 2017. Anyone that says suppression is a liar, schizo or a combination of both.
So kindly stfu about muh suppression because all demand for LINK token is Onchain and we can see everything that's going on dickhead.
There's no suppression!
SOL can pump!
SOL can pump because it isn't suppressed.
See Open the pic. Look at it.
Link/Swift news: Bitcoin dumps
SOL/Visa news: Bitcoin sleeps
So these insitution, SWIFT, DTCC, Ark invest. Are they buying the LINK token? No? Because there is no demand for it.
It's fucking over you have gone completely insane
Link performance from sept 2017 to August 2024: 6,935%
Eth performance September 2016 to August 2023: 14,450%
Eth has performed leagues better in a comparable time frame. STOP THE GASLIGHTING
Are you mentally challenged? Serious question.
It pumped because it had the biggest Onchain casino in history, hence the demand, hence the pump. Dumb fuck.
What demand is there for link token? There is none. Now kindly fuck off.
it’s fake news
they aren’t buying the token yet
Look at those goalposts fly
muh demand outweighs inflation
You people are too stupid to breathe lmao
See pic.
You said Link dumped harder. It objectively did not.
ETH recovered better, sure. But it also has a three-year head start from its ATH.
Shit government no regulation.
dr;ns
You said Link dumped harder
???
I said eth holders had made it already by then. A link make it stack is a measly 100k what the fuck CLL has to stop stealing money!!!
LINK dumped harder and no amount of mebtal gymnastics is going to change this
Chainlink's partnerships are meaningless and no amount of shill screching is ever going to change this, either
suck my balls jeet
LINK dumped harder and no amount of mebtal gymnastics is going to change this
ETH: 0.16 to 0.016
Link: 0.0017 to 0.00017
Both dumped nearly the exact same %.
Chainlink's partnerships are meaningless
I bet you cry yourself to sleep muttering this over and over to yourself.
>You said Link dumped harder
???
Yes. It's even literally greentexted in the post you quoted.
Yes. It's even literally greentexted in the post you quoted
I'm talking about usd, other guy is talking about btc. And he's correct
nothing
it was useless from the start
There was nothing there there.
other guy is talking about btc. And he's correct
Well he's not, is he?
ETH: 0.16 to 0.016
Link: 0.0017 to 0.00017
Both dumped nearly the exact same %.
I'm talking about usd
Weird, since you replied to a post about sats
so this is the new one for the next few weeks ?
Exactly, people bought it anyway. You're too stupid to understand this clearly. You probably weren't even around then so you wouldn't even know.
You must think price action is dictated by magic or something. Only that can explain your "suppression" thesis.
Exactly, people bought it anyway.
Exactly.
But not because they "had to" in order to use the network.
The absolute vast majority of demand came from pure speculative hype.
But not because they "had to" in order to use the network.
The absolute vast majority of demand came from pure speculative hype.
Great mind reader. How do you know they didn't stock up on it to use it later? Or to sell it to their users later?
who and what are you even talking about lmao
What an absolute retard you are. Let me break it down for you:
users need to buy eth to use eth smart contracts
people buy eth in anticipation of future use, not just for now
Doesn't work with Chainlink because you don't need to buy link to use the Chainlink network.
If they did that, then that's speculation like I said.
Also they'd have to stock up 75x more than they actually used in order to break even with inflation. It's ridiculous lmao
you don't need to buy link to use the Chainlink network
Sure you do.
Either directly or indirectly, you're paying for tokens.
You do not have to buy link to use Chainlink. Sergey accepts any currency.
WHATS THIS FUCKING BASED ET AL SHIT?????
Sergey accepts any currency.
Sergey is not "Chainlink".
Sergey uses Chainlink, and he pays them in Link tokens.
revenue of a lemonade stand lmao
what's the next carrot on a stick that sirgay will use to keep the baggies holding while he dumps on their heads?
Sergey is not "Chainlink".
Sergey uses Chainlink, and he pays them in Link tokens.
I wish this was true. Unfortunately he is the one running all the price feed contracts, selecting the nodes that can participate in the network, and the only one with access to the premint (the inflation is not coded in the Chainlink protocol, Sergey manually dumps it whenever he wishes to)... I could go on
I wish this was true
It literally is true.
I don't believe anyone is pathetic enough to pay shit posters on this god forsaken imageboard to spam fud, but the amount of times "carrot on a stick" is mentioned by you fuddies lately is curious lmao. Always the good little parrots.
You can get a Nigerian for 50,000 to 150,000 Naira a month.
That's $60-$180. It's nothing.
No one is paying fudders. Holders are just pissed because Sergey lines his pockets and blew up a company to 700 useless cretins.
Also the token had no demand, all the false promises and hype, price etc..
Advocates will still gaslight you into thinking they are doing a good job where CCIP has less value transferred than 20 other literal who bridges.
Now advocates will pivot to say it's for institutional which is another gaslight attempt. They are actually subhumans.
Afaik, the bridge thesis, CCIP value capture is cooked, everything is onchain for you to see. For LINK to increase in price you need people to use it, and guess what? No one wants to fucking use it, they would rather use LayerZero and WormHole. Because it's cheaper and can actually send USDT, the most liquid stablecoin in crypto.
And Linkies make no money from it, instead you'd rather be delusional and eat shit that served to you, rather than lighting a fire under Sergeys ass to increase token demand m. Truth over trust remember? The irony is unreal.
CLL just line their pockets with money that is supposed to boost token value. Fuck Sergey and fuck CLL and anyone that defends them.
Holders are just pissed
If the fud today is coming from pissed holders, then what the fuck were the holders pissed about in 2019 and 2020?
Because the fud is exactly the fucking same. Still the same Zeus Capital pseudo-fundamentals spammed all day every day.
Not selling;I make more money than you
It's been 7 years you fucking retard and chainshit made people miss out on 1 bullrun and is primed to underperform like the piece of dogshit that it is.
Do you shills honestly expect baggies who broke out of the cult to not lash out?
You fucking avocado piece of shit
chainshit made people miss out on 1 bullrun
No, Bitcoin hammering down every single bit of Link pump like fucking whack-a-mole did that.
No, at the time the energy was clearly on the shills side, lots of effort posting, euphoric posting, etc. Fud was light hearted and a bit out there. Zeus was hilarious for instance.
You can sense that the fud now is done by the same people that shilled it in 2019, same energy, effort posting, autism repeating the same truths until they're heard. The shills now are like the Bulgarians of 2019, they feel out of place, they sound like woke twitter name fags that worship the team shitting on them.
at the time the energy was clearly on the shills side
It absolutely was not. If anything the fud was even worse back then, to the point where it spilled out onto twitter, Google employees, even fucking Bloomberg articles.
b-but bitcoin!!!
shut the fuck up advocate
it doesn't matter why chainshit underperforms, nobody cares about your schizo theories
it's performing like a piece of shit while other cryptos pump, that's all that matters
Delusional.
Anon Babble was a Link board back then, you can tell the energy has shifted
it's performing like a piece of shit while other cryptos pump
Because Bitcoin only hammers down Link, not other cryptos.
Anon Babble was a Link board back then
Anon Babble was a link fud echo chamber back then. Arguably way worse than today because there was MUCH more spillover onto twitter and media.
What fud from back then? "Two man team?" The magnitude of the fud now compared to back then isn't even close.
Now we have Onchain metrics and everything that has transpired between then and now. And it's real hard hitting truths, not just rumors.
Back then there was tons of optimism. I remember was some anons fudding to keep out reddit, but we knew when reading what was up. Genuine fudders were always btfo by some smarter anon that made more sense.
In the end all that sense making was vacuous. Just fucking idealistic head canon brought about by Sergeys bombastic use of words.
Because Bitcoin only hammers down Link, not other cryptos.
Can you not read you retarded advocate?
The reason doesn't matter, if bitcoin doesn't affect other cryptos but affects link then link is a piece of shit
Anon Babble was a link fud echo chamber back then. Arguably way worse than today because there was MUCH more spillover onto twitter and media.
Way to out yourself as a newfag who wasn't there.
What fud from back then? "Two man team?"
Look up the Zeus Capital report.
The fud spam back then was insane.
bitcoin doesn't affect other cryptos
Because it doesn't hammer down their pumps.
Woah, easy there fellas. I just think it's funny how "carrot on a stick" became the flavor of the month snarky fuddy one liner.
Look up the Zeus Capital report.
And it got widely mocked and debunked on Anon Babble.
Disingenuous avocado shill piece of shit.
Because it doesn't hammer down their pumps.
Once again, links fault. Other cryptos can pump against the market.
fudders have been calling every missing feature of Chainlink a "carrot on a stick" for a very long time now, you should stick to lurking
it got widely mocked and debunked on Anon Babble
lmao you retard, all of the contents of the report came from Anon Babble in the first place.
The entire report is a condensation of the fud spammed to insane degrees on here.
links fault
It's Link's fault that Bitcoin dumps on Link pumps as they happen, but not on other coins's pumps?
If you say so, disgruntled baggie.
indeed, paid shill
Imagine wasting time and effort talking to people who you think are making money just from talking to you, while at the same time losing money holding the asset you're wasting time and effort on by talking about it non stop.
Just sell and do something else, anything. You'll increase your productivity exponentially.
I find it interesting how disgruntled baggies seem to extract some sort of salvation out of calling others paid shills when they don't follow the disgruntled baggie hivemind. Why won't you sell?
You fucking newfag, the Anon Babble fud was obviously tongue in cheek with shilling and euphoric posting greatly outnumbering it.
It's Link's fault that Bitcoin dumps on Link pumps as they happen, but not on other coins's pumps?
Yes, Link is a weak shitcoin that can't pump.
the Anon Babble fud was obviously tongue in cheek
Read the zeus capital report and find out, newfag.
Once again you stupid shill, once it came out it was widely mocked and debunked on Anon Babble.
Regardless, it's now been 7 years and chainshit hasn't delivered while sirgay just dumps on baggie heads and cashed out millions.
All fud is debunked on Anon Babble. Never stopped the fudders, not then and not now.
THE Cuckold of biz
spends 18 hours a day running link cult thought defense
noooooo you’re here all the time
has never touched a woman
has a picture of obesegod hanging in his basement
price -0.8%
Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahh
Sup bitch
Your hubris was your downfall
Is this the beginning of the link schizo nigerian arc?
2020
BTC $11,000
ETH $300
BNB $20
SOL $3
Link $20
2024
BTC $57,000
ETH $2,400
BNB $515
SOL $130
Link $10
You:
I won
the bulgarians and the nigerians are teaming up to form the bulniggers
wakes up late in the afternoon
hops on Anon Babble to spam his favorite catch phrases
will continue doing so until the late hours of the night, for years on end now
spends god knows how many hours on twatter as well
Kek. Probably the most disgruntled of baggies, if I may say so.
spends all his time fighting le fud
noooooo they spend all day here
Well how do you know that, are you there too?
w w well but Im a GOOD BOY so its not the same
Hahahahahhhhhhah bitch I live in your head
Any comments on the above prices? It’s ok to say it bothers you
Checked. I am barely on this dead board nowadays, but searching for a few of your catch phrases dredges up so much insanity in the archives that it becomes very apparent you spend an ungodly amount of time here, my good man.
As for my comment, I only hold ETH of the above mentioned tokens and I am patiently for the uptrend to resume. Maybe a bit bored, which is why I decided to check out the current state of this board. Immediately identified disgruntled LINK baggies as prime lolcow material. What are you holding and what is your sentiment currently?